Human Agency as a Factor in Corporate Success
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.14515/monitoring.2025.4.2927Keywords:
agency, corporate sector, economic development, entrepreneurship, platform employment, non-standard employmentAbstract
The article is devoted to the study of manifestations and methods of supporting agentic behavior, transforming the environment in a direction not determined by it, as a factor of success of contemporary corporations in the condition of neo-structuration. The latter is seen a new phase of societal evolution, which assumes a change in the relationship between individual action and social structure. Individual action becomes not just a mechanism for changing corporate structures in the logic they set, but a framework that ensures their preservation as dynamic entities in a poorly predictable environment. In the context of crisis trends in the economy, identifying productive forms of agency support in the corporate sector, as well as their classification, is an important theoretical and practical task, for which the authors conduct a review of Russian and international academic and practical literature covering more than 350 sources published since 2015.
The study shows that agency, the potential of which mobilizes the corporate sector, is highly diverse in forms and sources, it can be implemented both in individual-autonomous and in team forms, and can be oriented not only to the internal, but also to the external environment, including consumers or users. In addition, agency varies in strength and scale of effects. Thus, it can have a more or less strong strategic transformative influence on the organizational environment. Self-organized work teams are considered as an example of agency fields — a new type of structure in the corporate context built around individual agency and enhancing its effects. Special attention is paid to the forms of manifestation and effects of individual agency in the context of platform employment and corporate crowdsourcing, the importance of which increases in the context of reducing the rigidity of boundaries not only within the company, but also between the internal and external environment of the organization.
Acknowledgements. The research was supported by the Russian Science Foundation, grant No. 23-78-10182.
References
Долженко Р. А. Профессиональные сообщества: возможности формирования и использования в организации // Проблемы экономики и управления нефтегазовым комплексом. 2015. № 1. С. 34―39.
Dolzhenko R. A. (2015) Professional Communities: Possibilities of Formation and Use in the Organization. Problems of Economics and Management of the Oil and Gas Complex. No. 1. P. 34―39. (In Russ.)
Кузьминов Я. И., Сорокин П. С., Фрумин И. Д. Общие и специальные навыки как компоненты человеческого капитала: новые вызовы для теории и практики образования // Форсайт. 2019. Т. 13. № 2. С. 19―41. https://doi.org/10.26794/2220-6469-2020-14-2-6-15.
Kuzminov Ya. I., Sorokin P. S., Froumin I. D. (2019) Generic and Specific Skills as Components of Human Capital: New Challenges for Education Theory and Practice. Foresight and STI Governance. Vol. 13. No. 2. P. 19—41. https://doi.org/10.26794/2220-6469-2020-14-2-6-15. (In Russ.)
Сорокин П. С., Афанасьева И. А. Поля агентности в сфере искусства: акторы, среды проявления и факторы формирования // Социологические исследования. 2024. № 10. С. 129—138. https://doi.org/10.31857/S0132162524100119.
Sorokin P. S., Afanaseva I. A. (2024) Agency Fields in the Sphere of Art: Actors, Environments of Manifestation, and Factors of Formation. Sociological Studies. Vol. 10. P. 129—138. https://doi.org/10.31857/S0132162524100119. (In Russ.)
Сорокин П. С., Корешникова Ю. Н., Афанасьева И. А., Исаева О. М., Савинова С. Ю., Шубнякова Н. Г., Платонова Ю. А., Феодосиади Н. В., Зобнина М. Р., Назаров М. Г., Омельченко Е. Л., Крупец Я. Н., Нартова Н. А., Бордунос А. К., Карпинская Э. О., Широкова Г. В. Самостоятельность и проактивное поведение / науч. ред.: П. С. Сорокин. М.: Электронное издательство «Эгитас», 2022. Т. 2: Глобальный ландшафт исследований и перспективных разработок в области укрепления человека.
Sorokin P. S., Koreshnikova Yu. N., Afanaseva I. A., Isaeva O. M., Savinova S. Yu., Shubnyakova N. G., Platonova Yu. A., Feodosiadi N. V., Zobnina M. R., Nazarov M. G., Omelchenko E. L., Krupets Ya. N., Nartova N. A., Bordunos A. K., Karpinskaya E. O., Shirokova G. V. (2022) Independence and proactive behavior. Moscow: Egitas Electronic Publishing House. Vol. 2: Global Landscape of Research and Promising Developments in Human Empowerment. (In Russ.)
Сорокин П. С., Мальцева В. А. От дискретных навыков — к целостному созидательному человеческому потенциалу: новый подход в теории и практике // Форсайт. 2024. Т. 18. № 1. С. 6—17. https://doi.org/10.17323/2500-2597.2024.1.6.17.
Sorokin P., Maltseva V. (2024) From Discrete Skills to Holistic Creative Human Potential: An Emerging Approach in Theory and Practice. Foresight and STI Governance. Vol. 18. No. 1. P. 6—17. https://doi.org/10.17323/2500-2597.2024.1.6.17. (In Russ.)
Сорокин П. С., Редько Т. Д. Современные исследования агентности в сфере образования: систематизация ключевых понятий и разработок // Вопросы образования. 2024. № 1. С. 236—264. https://doi.org/10.17323/vo-2024-18131.
Sorokin P. S., Redko T. D. (2024) Contemporary Research on Agency in Education: A Systematization of Key Concepts and Developments. Educational Studies Moscow. Vol. 1. P. 236—264. https://doi.org/10.17323/vo-2024-18131. (In Russ.)
Сорокин П. С., Фрумин И. Д. Образование как источник действия, совершенствующего структуры: теоретические подходы и практические задачи // Вопросы образования. 2022. № 1. С. 116—137. https://doi.org/10.17323/1814-9545-2022-1-116-137.
Sorokin P. S., Froumin I. D. (2022) Education as a Source for Transformative Agency: Theoretical and Practical Issues. Educational Studies Moscow. Vol. 1. P. 116—137. https://doi.org/10.17323/1814-9545-2022-1-116-137. (In Russ.)
Сорокин П. С. Проблема «агентности» через призму новой реальности: состояние и направления развития // Социологические исследования. 2023. № 3. С. 103—114. https://doi.org/10.31857/S013216250022927-2.
Sorokin P. S. (2023) The Problem of “Agency” Through the Prism of a New Reality: Conditions and Perspectives. Sociological Studies. Vol. 3. P. 103—114. https://doi.org/10.31857/S013216250022927-2. (In Russ.)
Флигстин Н., Макадам Д. Теория полей. М.: ВШЭ, 2022.
Fligstein N., Macadam D. (2022) Field Theory. Moscow: HSE. (In Russ.)
Aarikka-Stenroos L., Ritala P. (2017) Network Management in the Era of Ecosystems: Systematic Review and Management Framework. Industrial Marketing Management. Vol. 67. P. 23—36. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.indmarman.2017.08.010.
Anderson S. J., McKenzie D. (2022) Improving Business Practices and the Boundary of the Entrepreneur: A Randomized Experiment Comparing Training, Consulting, Insourcing, and Outsourcing. Journal of Political Economy. Vol. 130. No. 1. P. 157—209. https://doi.org/10.1086/717044.
Acs A. (2016) Which Statute to Implement? Strategic Timing by Regulatory Agencies. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory. Vol. 26. No. 3. P. 493—506. https://doi.org/10.1093/jopart/muv018.
Archer M. S. (2024) Can Complexity Add Anything to Critical Realism and the Morphogenetic Approach? Journal for the Theory of Social Behaviour. Vol. 54. No. 4. P. 422—433. https://doi.org/10.1111/jtsb.12419.
Banik N., Padalkar M. (2021) The Spread of Gig Economy: Trends and Effects. Foresight and STI Governance. Vol. 15. No. 1. P. 19—29. https://doi.org/10.17323/2500-2597.2021.1.19.29.
Benitez-Amado J., Walczuch R. (2012) Information Technology, the Organizational Capability of Proactive Corporate Environmental Strategy and Firm Performance: A Resource-Based Analysis. European Journal of Information Systems. Vol. 21. No. 6. P. 664—679. https://doi.org/10.1057/ejis.2012.14.
Bosman R. (2022) Into Transition Space: Destabilisation and Incumbent Agency in an Accelerating Energy Transition. PhD Thesis. Rotterdam: Erasmus University.
Bowie N. E. (2019) International Business as a Possible Civilizing Force in a Cosmopolitan World. Journal of Business Ethics. Vol. 155. No. 4. P. 941—950. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-017-3670-8 .
Brodnik C., Brown R. (2017) The Co-Evolution of Institutional Logics and Boundary Spanning in Sustainability Transitions: The Case of Urban Stormwater Management in Melbourne, Australia. Environment and Natural Resources Research. Vol. 7. No. 3. P. 36—50. https://doi.org/10.5539/enrr.v7n3p36.
Bromley P., Meyer J. W. (2021) Hyper-Management: Neoliberal Expansions of Purpose and Leadership. Organization Theory. Vol. 2. No. 3. https://doi.org/10.1177/26317877211020327.
Bronnikova E., Kuljamina O., Vinogradova M. (2020) Application of Crowdsourcing Technology in Terms of Digitization of Supply Chain Strategy. International Journal of Supply Chain Management. Vol. 9. No. 3. P. 524—536.
Brown R., Mawson S., Rocha А., Rowe А. (2025) Looking Inside the ‘Black Box’ of Digital Firm Scaling: An Ethnographically Informed Conceptualisation. Journal of Business Research. Vol. 186. Art. 114987. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2024.114987.
Cavazzoni, F., Fiorini A., Veronese G. (2021) How Do We Assess How Agentic We Are? A Literature Review of Existing Instruments to Evaluate and Measure Individuals’ Agency. Social Indicators Research. Vol. 159. No. 3. P. 1125—1153. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11205-021-02791-8.
Dunn M. (2020) Making Gigs Work: Digital Platforms, Job Quality and Worker Motivations. New Technology, Work and Employment. Vol. 35. No. 2. P. 232—249. https://doi.org/10.1111/ntwe.12167.
Emirbayer M., Mische A. (1998) What is Agency? American Journal of Sociology. Vol. 103. No. 4. P. 962—1023. https://doi.org/10.1086/231294.
de Haan F.J., Rotmans J. (2018) A Proposed Theoretical Framework for Actors in Transformative Change. Technological Forecasting and Social Change. Vol. 128. P. 275—286. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2017.12.017.
Hossain M., Kauranen I. (2015) Crowdsourcing: A Comprehensive Literature Review. Strategic Outsourcing: An International Journal. Vol. 8. No. 1. P. 2—22. https://doi.org/10.1108/SO-12-2014-0029.
Kohler T., Nickel M. (2017) Crowdsourcing Business Models that Last. Journal of Business Strategy. Vol. 38. No. 2. P. 25—32. https://doi.org/10.1108/JBS-10-2016-0120.
Kringelum L.B., Brix J. (2020) Critical Realism and Organizational Learning. Learning Organization. Vol. 28. No. 1. P. 32—45. https://doi.org/10.1108/TLO-03-2020-0035.
Mironenko I., Sorokin P. S. (2022) Activity Theory for the De-Structuralized Modernity. Integrative Psychological and Behavioral Science. Vol. 56. P. 1055—1071. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12124-020-09587-4.
Mittal S., Dhar R. L. (2015) Transformational Leadership and Employee Creativity: Mediating Role of Creative Self-Efficacy and Moderating Role of Knowledge Sharing. Management Decision. Vol. 53. No. 5. P. 894—910. https://doi.org/10.1108/MD-07-2014-0464.
Monsen K. A., Blok J. (2013) Buurtzorg: Nurse-Led Community Care. Creative Nurs. Vol. 19. No. 3. P. 122—127. https://doi.org/10.1891/1078-4535.19.3.122.
Parker J. N., Corte U. (2017) Placing Collaborative Circles in Strategic Action Fields: Explaining Differences between Highly Creative Groups. Sociological Theory. Vol. 35. No. 4. P. 261—287. https://doi.org/10.1177/0735275117740400.
Prandini R. (2015) Relational Sociology: A Well-Defined Sociological Paradigm or a Challenging ‘Relational Turn’ in Sociology? International Review of Sociology. Vol. 25. No. 1. P. 1—14. https://doi.org/10.1080/03906701.2014.997969.
Prpic J., Kietzmann J. H., McCarthy I. P., Shukla P. P. (2015) How to Work a Crowd: Developing Crowd Capital through Crowdsourcing. Business Horizons. Vol. 58. No. 1. 77—85. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bushor.2014.09.005.
Ruotsalainen S., Elovainio M., Jantunen S., Sinervoa T. (2022) The Mediating Effect of Psychosocial Factors in the Relationship between Self-Organizing Teams and Employee Wellbeing: A Cross-Sectional Observational Study. International Journal of Nursing Studies. Vol. 138. Art. 104415. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2022.104415.
Schultz T.W. (1975) The Value of the Ability to Deal with Disequilibria. Journal of Economic Literature. Vol. 13. No. 3. P. 827—846.
Smink M. M., Hekkert M. P., Negro S. O. (2015) Keeping Sustainable Innovation on a Leash? Exploring Incumbents’ Institutional Strategies. Business Strategy and the Environment. Vol. 24. No. 2. P. 86—101. https://doi.org/10.1002/bse.1808.
Sorokin P. S. (2020) The Promise of John W. Meyer’s World Society Theory: “Otherhood” through the Prism of Pitirim A. Sorokin’s Integralism. The American Sociologist. Vol. 51. No. 4. P. 506—525. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12108-020-09468-8.
Sun P., Chen J. Y. (2021) Platform Labour and Contingent Agancy in China. China Perspectives. Vol. 1. P. 19—27. https://doi.org/10.4000/chinaperspectives.11325.
van den Groenendaal S. M. E., Akkermans J., Fleisher C., Dorien T. A. M., Rob F. P., Freese Ch. (2022) A Qualitative Exploration of Solo Selfemployed Workers’ Career Sustainability. Journal of Vocational Behavior. Vol. 134. Art. 103692. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jvb.2022.103692.
Wax A., DeChurch L. A., Contractor N. S. (2017) Self-Organizing into Winning Teams: Understanding the Mechanisms That Drive Successful Collaborations. Small Group Research. Vol. 48. No. 6. P. 665—718. https://doi.org/10.1177/1046496417724209.
Wu C. H., Deng H., Li Y. (2018) Enhancing a Sense of Competence at Work by Engaging in Proactive Behavior: The Role of Proactive Personality. Journal of Happiness Studies. Vol. 19. No. 3. Р. 801—816. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10902-016-9827-9.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Monitoring of Public Opinion: Economic and Social Changes
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
