Disciplinary and Conceptual Diversity in Life Choice Research

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.14515/monitoring.2024.3.2610

Keywords:

life choices, life path, rational choice, limited rationality, deliberate choice

Abstract

The article presents a Special Issue of the Journal dedicated to the study of life choices. The authors substantiate the relevance of the development of this direction in modern context, identify the key vectors for the development of theoretical and empirical scientific work on issues of choice and decision-making, as well as the main methodological challenges in the designated field. The article describes the diversity of the current landscape in life choice research and shows that certain approaches developed within disciplines such as sociology, economics, and psychology allow us to consider the mechanics of decision-making from different points of view and assess their consequences, but do not yet offer a harmonized conceptual apparatus and a comprehensive view of the subject. The authors see interdisciplinarity and the use of combined sources and methods of collecting empirical data as promising directions for further development of this research topic. In the final part, the authors present the articles included in the Special Issue.

Acknowledgements. This article is an output of a research project implemented as part of the Basic Research Program at the HSE University. The authors thank Ekaterina Pavlenko for her participation in the work on this Special Issue.

Author Biographies

Svetlana S. Biryukova, HSE University; Russian Public Opinion Research Center

  • Национальный исследовательский университет «Высшая школа экономики», Москва, Россия
    • кандидат экономических наук, ведущий научный сотрудник Центра комплексных исследований социальной политики Института социальной политики
  • Всероссийский центр изучения общественного мнения, Москва, Россия
    • заместитель ответственного редактора журнала «Мониторинг общественного мнения: экономические и социальные перемены»
  • National Research University Higher School of Economics, Moscow, Russia
    • Cand. Sci. (Econ.), Leading Research Fellow at the Centre for Comprehensive Social Policy Studies, Institute for Social Policy
  • Russian Public Opinion Research Center, Moscow, Russia
    • Executive Editor at the “Monitoring of Public Opinion: Economic and Social Changes” Journal

Oxana V. Sinyavskaya, HSE University

  • HSE University, Moscow, Russia
    • Cand. Sci. (Econ.), Director of the Centre for Comprehensive Social Policy Studies, Deputy Director at the Institute for Social Policy

Alexandra A. Bochaver, HSE University

  • HSE University, Moscow, Russia
    • Cand. Sci. (Psych.), Senior Research Fellow, Director of the Centre for Modern Childhood Studies, Institute of Education
    • Associate Professor at the Department of Educational Programmes, Institute of Education

Maria A. Nagernyak, HSE University

  • HSE University, Moscow, Russia
    • Head of the Centre for Time Budget Studies, Institute for Social Policy

References

Бек У. От индустриального общества к обществу риска // Thesis. 1994. № 5. C. 161-168.

Beck U. (1994) Theory, Culture and Society. Thesis. No. 5. P. 161-168. (In Russ.)

Бек У. Общество риска. На пути к другому модерну. М.: Прогресс-традиция, 2000.

Beck U. (2000) Risikogesellschaft – Auf dem Weg in eine andere Moderne. Moscow: Progress-traditsiya. (In Russ.)

Берберова Н. Н. Курсив мой. М.: АСТ: Редакция Елены Шубиной, 2022.

Berberova N.N. (2022) Italics are Mine. Moscow: AST Publishing House: Editorial of Elena Shubina. (In Russ.)

Василюк Ф.Е. Психотехника выбора // Психология с человеческим лицом: гуманистическая перспектива в постсоветской психологии / под ред. Д.А. Леонтьева, В.Г. Щур. М.: Смысл, 1997. С. 284-314.

Vasilyuk F.Ye. (1997) Psychotechnics of Choice. In: Leontiev D.A., Schur V.G. (eds.) Psychology with a Human Face: A Humanistic Perspective in Post-Soviet Psychology. Moscow: Smysl. P. 284-314. (In Russ.)

Куракин Д. Ю., Латыпов И. А. Экосистемы выбора: о некоторых ограничениях теории рационального выбора и стратегии их преодоления // Экономическая социология. 2023. Т. 24. № 3. С. 11-32.

Kurakin D., Latypov I. (2023) Ecosystems of Choice: On Some Limitations of Rational Choice Theory and a Strategy for Overcoming Them. Journal of Economic Sociology. Vol. 24. No. 3. P. 11-32. (In Russ.)

Лок Э., Стронг Т. Как устроена матрица? Социальное конструирование реальности: теория и практика / Пер. с англ. Д.В. Онегов, А.В. Зиндер, К.М. Зиндер, А. Мирзоянц; ред. перевода С.А. Ромашко. М.: ВЦИОМ, 2021.

Lock A., Strong T. (2021) Sources and Stirrings in Theory and Practice. Moscow: VCIOM. (In Russ.)

Шапиро Д. На эмоциях: как улаживать самые болезненные конфликты в семье, бизнесе и политике. М.: Альпина Паблишер, 2017.

Shapiro D. (2017) Negotiating the Nonnegotiable How to Resolve Your Most Emotionally Charged Conflicts. Moscow: Alpina Publishers. (In Russ.)

Arrighi B. A., Maume D. J. (2000) Workplace Subordination and Men’s Avoidance of Housework. Journal of Family Issues. Vol. 21. P. 464—487. https://doi.org/10.1177/019251300021004003.

Billari F. C., Liefbroer A. C. (2010) Towards a New Pattern of Transition to Adulthood? Advances in Life Course Research. Vol. 15. No. 2—3. P. 59—75. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.alcr.2010.10.003.

Baizán P., Michielin F., Billari F. C. (2002) Political Economy and Life Course Patterns: The Heterogeneity of Occupational, Family and Household Trajectories of Young Spaniards. Demographic Research. Vol. 6. P. 191—240. https://doi.org/10.4054/DemRes.2002.6.8.

Becker G. S. (1965) A Theory of the Allocation of Time. The Economic Journal. Vol. 75. No. 299. P. 493—517. https://doi.org/10.2307/2228949.

Billari F. C., Hiekel N., Liefbroer A. C. (2019) The Social Stratification of Choice in the Transition to Adulthood. European Sociological Review. Vol. 35. No. 5. P. 599—615. https://doi.org/10.1093/esr/jcz025.

Brannen J., Nilsen A. (2005) Individualisation, Choice and Structure: A Discussion of Current Trends in Sociological Analysis. The Sociological Review. Vol. 53. No. 3. P. 412—428. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-954X.2005.00559.x.

Broniarczyk S. M., Griffin J. G. (2014) Decision Difficulty in the Age of Consumer Empowerment. Journal of Consumer Psychology. Vol. 24. No. 4. P. 608—625. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcps.2014.05.003.

Chernev A., Böckenholt U., Goodman J. (2015) Choice Overload: A Conceptual Review and Meta-Analysis. Journal of Consumer Psychology. Vol. 25. No. 2. P. 333—358. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jcps.2014.08.002.

Cortois L., Laermans R. (2018) Rethinking Individualization: The Basic Script and the Three Variants of Institutionalized Individualism. European Journal of Social Theory. Vol. 21. No. 1. P. 60—78. https://doi.org/10.1177/1368431017698474.

Evans K. (2002) Taking Control of Their Lives? Agency in Young Adult Transitions in England and the New Germany. Journal of Youth Studies. Vol. 5. No. 3. P. 245—269. https://doi.org/10.2304/eerj.2002.1.3.7.

Gershuny J. I., Pahl R. E. (1979) Work outside Employment: Some Preliminary Speculations. Higher Education Quarterly. Vol. 34. No. 1. P. 120—135. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2273.1979.tb01252.x.

Inglehart R., Welzel C. (2005) Modernization, Cultural Change, and Democracy: The Human Development Sequence. Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511790881.

Kahneman D., Tversky A. (1979) On the Interpretation of Intuitive Probability: A Reply to Jonathan Cohen. Cognition. Vol. 7. No. 4. P. 409—411.

Kahneman D. (2003) Maps of Bounded Rationality: Psychology for Behavioral Economics. American Economic Review. Vol. 93. No. 5. P. 1449—1475.

Manser M., Brown M. (1980) Marriage and Household Decision-Making: A Bargaining Analysis. International Economic Review. Vol. 21. No. 1. P. 31—44. https://doi.org/10.2307/2526238.

McMunn A., Lacey R., Worts D., McDonough P., Stafford M., Booker C., Kumari M., Sacker A. (2015) De-standardization and Gender Convergence in Work—Family Life Courses in Great Britain: A Multi-Channel Sequence Analysis. Advances in Life Course Research. Vol. 26. P. 60—75. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.alcr.2015.06.002.

Rubenson K., Desjardins R. (2009) The Impact of Welfare State Regimes on Barriers to Participation in Adult Education: A Bounded Agency Model. Adult Education Quarterly. Vol. 59. No. 3. P. 187—207. https://doi.org/10.1177%2F0741713609331548.

Schwartz B. (2004) The Tyranny of Choice. Scientific American. Vol. 290. No. 4. P. 70—75. https://doi.org/10.1038/scientificamerican0404-70.

Shanahan M. J., Hood K. E. (2000) Adolescents in Changing Social Structures: Bounded Agency in Life Course Perspective. In: Crockett L.J., Silbereisen R.K. Negotiating Adolescence in Times of Social Change. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press P. 123—134.

Van Winkle Z. (2020) Family Policies and Family Life Course Complexity across 20th-Century Europe. Journal of European Social Policy. Vol. 30. No. 3. P. 320—338. https://doi.org/10.1177/0958928719880508.

Published

2024-07-10

How to Cite

Biryukova, S. S., Sinyavskaya, O. V., Bochaver, A. A., & Nagernyak, M. A. (2024). Disciplinary and Conceptual Diversity in Life Choice Research. Monitoring of Public Opinion: Economic and Social Changes, (3), 3—14. https://doi.org/10.14515/monitoring.2024.3.2610

Most read articles by the same author(s)