Professional Identity of HR Manager as a Factor of Inclusive Hiring and Development of Women in Russian Companies

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.14515/monitoring.2024.4.2560

Keywords:

HR-manager’s professional identity, HR-manager’s individual characteristics, inclusion, stereotypes, neo-institutionalism, sense-making theory, employment of women

Abstract

The study tests the hypothesis that the professional identity of an HR manager is associated with the proportion of women in the company and the presence of trackable indicators (KPI) for their hiring and promotion. Empirically and methodologically, the study is based on the results of the nationwide survey of HR-managers “Prospects for Inclusive Employment in Russian Companies and Factors Affecting Diversity Management in the Context of Global Challenges” (2021, N = 2050) conducted by the HSE Center for Interdisciplinary Research of Human Potential and multiple linear regression models. The interpretation of the results is based on the theory of sense-making by Weick and sociological neo-institutionalism as an approach to the analysis of organizations. The authors show that individual characteristics and professional identity of HR managers correlates with both the proportion of women in the company and the presence of the specific KPI indicators. The strongest predictor of changes in the proportion of women in a company is the HR manager's adherence to stereotypes about them. Formal institutions, such as company’s attitude to international norms and regulations for ensuring inclusion in a company, are more likely to create the prerequisites for an inclusive environment in general, but do not increase the proportion of women. At the same time, HR managers are more likely to bring women into the company, but less likely to systematically monitor women’s hiring and promotion practices. That is, formal institutions contribute to the inclusive agenda of a company, supporting its legitimacy, but do not become drivers of hiring women.

Acknowledgments. The study was carried out within a grant provided by the Ministry of Science and Higher Education of the Russian Federation (grant agreement No. 075152022325).

The authors would like to express their sincere gratitude to Christian Fröhlich for his significant contribution to the idea of this article.

Author Biographies

Viktoria K. Antonova, HSE University

  • HSE University, Moscow, Russia
    • Dr. Sci. (Soc.), PhD, Professor at the Department of General Sociology, School of Sociology
    • Leading Research Fellow at the International Laboratory for Social Integration Research

Marina Yu. Aleksandrova, HSE University

  • HSE University, Moscow, Russia
    • Lecturer at the Department of Sociological Research Methods, School of Sociology

Daria I. Prisyazhniuk, HSE University

  • HSE University, Moscow, Russia
    • Cand. Sci. (Soc.), Associate Professor at the Department of General Sociology, School of Sociology
    • Leading Research Fellow at the International Laboratory for Social Integration Research 

Tatiana A. Ryabichenko, HSE University

  • HSE University, Moscow, Russia
    • Cand. Sci. (Psych.), Associate Professor at the School of Psychology
    • Senior Research Fellow at the International Laboratory for Social Integration Research 

References

Антонова В. К., Присяжнюк Д. И., Рябиченко Т. А. Креативный эффект, инвестиции и инклюзия как норма жизни: установки HR-менеджеров России в отношении инклюзивного трудоустройства // Журнал исследований социальной политики. 2021. Т. 19. № 3. С. 373―388. https://doi.org/10.17323/727-0634-2021-19-3-373-388.

Antonova V., Prisyahniuk D., Ryabichenko Т. (2021) Investment and INCLUSION as a Norm of Life: Attitudes of Russian HR-Managers to Inclusive Employment. The Journal of Social Policy Studies. Vol. 19. No 3. P. 373―388. https://doi.org/10.17323/727-0634-2021-19-3-373-388. (In Russ.)

Брушкова Л. А. Гендерная структура занятости в России как индикатор формирования нового гендерного порядка // Гуманитарные науки. Вестник Финансового университета. 2021. Т. 11. № 4. С. 139―143. https://doi.org/10.26794/2226-7867-2021-11-4-139-143.

Brushkova L. A. (2021) Gender Structure of Employment in Russia as an Indicator of the New Gender Order Establishing. Humanities and Social Sciences. Bulletin of the Financial University. Vol. 11. No. 4. P. 139―143. https://doi.org/10.26794/2226-7867-2021-11-4-139-143. (In Russ.)

Гидденс Э., Саттон Ф. Основные понятия в социологии / пер. с англ. Е. Рождественской, С. Гавриленко. М.: ИД ВШЭ, 2018.

Giddens E., Sutton Ph. (2018) Essential Concepts in Sociology. Moscow: HSE. (In Russ.)

Козина И. М. Профессиональная сегрегация: гендерные стереотипы на рынке труда // Социологический журнал. 2002. № 3. С. 126―136.

Kozina I. M. (2002) Occupational Segregation: Gender Stereotypes in the Labor Market. Sociological Journal. No. 3. P. 126―136. (In Russ.)

Коковихин А. Ю., Кулапов М. Н., Дворакова З. Развитие необходимых компетенций для управления социально-культурным многообразием персонала // Управленец. 2017. № 1 (65). С. 9―19.

Kokovikhin A. Yu., Kulapov M. N., Dvorakova Z. (2017) Developing the Competencies Essential for Cross-Cultural Diversity Management in the Workplace. The Manager. No. 1. P. 9―19. (In Russ.)

Латуха М. О., Хасиева Д. Д., Веселова А. С., Шагалкина М. В., Селивановских Л. В. Гендерно-ориентированные практики управления талантливыми сотрудниками в российских компаниях // Вестник Санкт-Петербургского университета. Менеджмент. 2020. Т. 19. № 1. C. 34―66. https://doi.org/10.21638/11701/spbu08.2020.102.

Latukha M. O., Khasieva D. D., Veselova A. S., Shagalkina M. V., Selivanovskikh L. V. (2020) Gender-Oriented Talent Management Practices in Russian Companies. Vestnik of Saint Petersburg University. Management. Vol. 19. No. 1. P. 34―66. https://doi.org/10.21638/11701/spbu08.2020.102. (In Russ.)

Мачульская Е. Е. Концепция инвалидности в международных и российских нормативных актах // Социальное и пенсионное право. 2015. № 4. С. 20―26.

Machulskaya E. E. (2015) The Concept of Disability in International and Russian Regulations. Social and Pension Law. No. 4. P. 20―26. (In Russ.)

Минева О. К., Арутюнян С. А., Гаджиева Е. А., Смирнова Д. Ш. Проблемы и возможности социальной адаптации лиц с ограниченными возможностями здоровья в современном обществе // Российский экономический интернет-журнал. 2018. № 2. Ст. 59.

Mineva O. K., Arutyunyan S. A., Gadzhieva E. A., Smirnova D. Sh. (2018) Problems and Opportunities for Social Adaptation of Persons with Disabilities in Modern Society. Russian Economic Online Journal. No. 2. Art. 59. (In Russ.)

Московская А. А. Cтереотипы или конкуренция? (Анализ некоторых гендерных предпочтений работодателей) // Социологические исследования. 2002. № 3. С. 52―61.

Moskovskaya A. A (2002) Stereotypes or Competition? (Analysis of Some Gender Preferences of Employers). Sociological Studies. No. 3. P. 52―61. (In Russ.)

Нагибина Н. И., Могильникова В. А. Управление разнообразием человеческих ресурсов как фактор конкурентоспособности компании // Управление персоналом и интеллектуальными ресурсами в России. 2019. Т. 8. № 4. С. 66―73. https://doi.org/10.12737/article_5d7b97e5571b33.96787091.

Nagibina N. I., Mogilnikova V. A. (2019) Human Resources Diversity Management as a Factor of Company Competitive Ability. Management of the Personnel and Intellectual Resources in Russia. Vol. 8. No. 4. P. 66―73. https://doi.org/10.12737/article_5d7b97e5571b33.96787091. (In Russ.)

Пашкова Г. Г. Проблемы занятости и трудоустройства инвалидов в Российской Федерации // Вестник Томского государственного университета. Право. 2018. № 29. C. 162—173. https://doi.org/10.17223/22253513/29/15.

Pashkova G. G. (2018) Problems of Engagement and Employment of Disabled People in the Russian Federation. Tomsk State University Journal of Law. No. 29. P. 162—173. https://doi.org/10.17223/22253513/29/15. (In Russ.)

Пилкина М. В. Гендерные аспекты карьерных траекторий женщин в России // Вестник Пермского университета. Политология. 2024. Т. 18. № 1. С. 73—81. https://doi.org/10.17072/2218-1067-2024-1-73-81.

Pilkina M. V. (2024) Gender Aspects of Women’s Career Trajectories in Russia. Bulletin of Perm University. Political Science. Vol. 18. No. 1. P. 73—81. https://doi.org/10.17072/2218-1067-2024-1-73-81. (In Russ.)

Попкова Л. Н., Тартаковская И. Н. Профессиональные стратегии менеджеров среднего звена (гендерный аспект) // Cоциологические исследования. 2011. № 7. С. 48—57.

Popkova L. N., Tartakovskaya I. N. (2011) Middle Level Managers Professional Strategies (Gender Aspect). Sociological Studies. No. 7. P. 48—57. (In Russ.)

Рощин С. Ю., Емелина Н. К. Мета-анализ гендерного разрыва в оплате труда в России // Экономический журнал ВШЭ. 2022. Т. 26. № 2. С. 213—239. https://doi.org/10.17323/1813-8691-2022-26-2-213-239.

Roshchin S. Yu., Yemelina N. K. (2022) Meta-Analysis of the Gender Pay Gap in Russia. HSE Economic Journal. Vol. 26. No. 2. P. 213—239. https://doi.org/10.17323/1813-8691-2022-26-2-213-239. (In Russ.)

Силласте Г. Г. Гендерная политика и социальный механизм ее возможной реализации // Гендерная политика в России и в мире: экономика, управление, общество. Материалы Всероссийской научной конференции / под ред. О. А. Хасбулатовой, И. Н. Смирновой. Иваново: Ивановский государственный университет, 2021. С. 3—13.

Sillaste G. G. (2021) Gender Policy and the Social Mechanism of its Possible Implementation. In: Khasbulatova O. A., Smirnova I. N. (eds.) Gender Policy in Russia and in the World: Economics, Management, Society. Proceedings of the All-Russian Scientific Conference. Ivanovo: Ivanovo State University. P. 3—13. (In Russ.)

Хасс Д. Социологический неоинституционализм и анализ организаций (предисловие к разделу) // Вестник Санкт-Петербургского университета. Менеджмент. 2007. № 3. C. 112—125.

Hass J. K. (2007) Sociological Neoinstitutionalism of Organizational Analyses. Vestnik of Saint Petersburg University. Management. No. 3. P. 112—125. (In Russ.)

Хоткина З. А. Позитивные изменения в жизни россиянок в XXI веке // Женщины России XXI век: гендерные исследования / под науч. ред. Н. М. Римашевской. М.: Экон-Информ, 2016. С. 21—28.

Khotkina Z. A. (2016) Positive Сhanges in the Life of Russian Women in the XXI century. In: Rimashevskaya N. M. (ed.) Women of Russia in XXI Century: Gender Studies. Moscow: Ekon-Inform. P. 21—28. (In Russ.)

Чирикова А. Е. Женщина во главе фирмы. М.: Издательство Института социологии РАН, 1998.

Chirikova A. E. (1998) Woman at the Head of the Firm. Moscow: Institute of Sociology of the RAS. (In Russ.)

Чирикова А. Е. Женщина и мужчина как топ-менеджеры российских компаний // Социологические исследования. 2003. № 1. С 73—82.

Chirikova A. E. (2003) Woman and Man as Top Managers of Russian Companies. Sociological Studies. No. 1. P. 73—82. (In Russ.)

Чирикова А. Е. Женщина-руководитель во власти и бизнесе: социально-психологический портрет // Политическая экспертиза: ПОЛИТЭКС. 2011. Т. 7. № 1. С. 142—162.

Chirikova A. E. (2011) Woman Leader in Government and Business: A Socio-Psychological Portrait. Political Expertise: POLITEX. Vol. 7. No. 1. P. 142—162. (In Russ.)

Balka E., Wagner I. (2021) A Historical View of Studies of Women’s Work. Computer Supported Cooperative Work. Vol. 30. P. 251—305. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10606-020-09387-9.

Bryant-Lees K. B., Kite M. E. (2021) Evaluations of LGBT* Job Applicants: Consequences of Applying “Out”. Equality, Diversity and Inclusion. Vol. 40. No. 7. P. 874—891. https://doi.org/10.1108/EDI-01-2019-0048.

Colgan F., McKearney A., Bokovikova E., Kosheleva S., Zavyalova E. (2014) Employment Equality and Diversity Management in a Russian Context. In: Klarsfeld A., Booysen L., Ng E., Roper I., Tatli A. (eds.) International Handbook on Diversity Management at Work (2nd ed.). Cheltenham: Edward Elgar Pub. Ltd. P. 217—240. http://dx.doi.org/10.4337/9780857939319.00017.

Czarniawska B. (2005) Karl Weick: Concepts, Style and Reflection. The Sociological Review. Vol. 53. No. 1. P. 267—278. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-954X.2005.00554.x.

Galperin H. (2019) “This Gig is not for Women”: Gender Stereotyping in Online Hiring. Social Science Computer Review. Vol. 39. No. 6. P. 1089—1107. https://doi.org/10.1177/0894439319895757.

Garg S., Sangwan S. (2021) Literature Review on Diversity and Inclusion at Workplace, 2010—2017. Vision. Vol. 25. No. 1. P. 12—22. https://doi.org/10.1177/0972262920959523.

Hilton J. L., von Hippel W. (1996) Stereotypes. Annual Review of Psychology. Vol. 47. P. 237—271. http://dx.doi.org/10.1146/annurev.psych.47.1.237.

Kaur N., Arora P. (2020) Acknowledging Gender Diversity and Inclusion as Key to Organizational Growth: A Review and Trends. Journal of Critical Reviews. Vol. 7. No. 6. P. 125—131.

Kleinert C., Leuze K., Bächmann A.-C., Gatermann D., Hägglund A.E., Rompczyk K. (2023) Occupational Sex Segregation and its Consequences for the (Re-)Production of Gender Inequalities in the German Labour Market. In: Weinert S., Blossfeld G. J., Blossfeld H.-P. (eds.) Education, Competence Development and Career Trajectories. Methodology of Educational Measurement and Assessment. Cham: Springer. P. 295—317. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-27007-9_13.

Kulik C. T. (2022) Gender (In)Equality in Australia: Good Intentions and Unintended Consequences. Asia Pacific Journal of Human Resources. Vol. 60. No. 1. P. 97—115. https://doi.org/10.1111/1744-7941.12312.

Lau V. W., Scott V. L., Warren M. A., Bligh M. C. (2023) Moving from Problems to Solutions: A Review of Gender Equality Interventions at Work Using an Ecological Systems Approach. Journal of Organizational Behavior. Vol. 44. No. 2. P. 399—419. https://doi.org/10.1002/job.2654.

March J. G., Olsen J. P. (1983) The New Institutionalism: Organizational Factors of Political Life. American Political Science Review. Vol. 78. No. 3. P. 734—749. https://doi.org/10.2307/1961840.

Mousa M. (2021) Does Gender Diversity Affect Workplace Happiness for Academics? The Role of Diversity Management and Organizational Inclusion. Public Organization Review. No. 21. P. 119—135. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11115-020-00479-0.

North D. C. (1990) Institutions, Institutional Change, and Economic Performance. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.

Phillips N., Thomas B. L., Hardy C. (2004) Discourse and Institutions. The Academy of Management Review. Vol. 29. P. 635—652. https://doi.org/10.2307/20159075.

Piopiunik M., Schwerdt G., Simon L., Woessmann L. (2020) Skills, Signals, and Employability: An Experimental Investigation. European Economic Review. Vol. 123. Art. 103374. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.euroecorev.2020.103374.

Powell W. W., Bromley P. (2015) New Institutionalism in the Analysis of Complex Organizations. In: Wright J. D. (ed.) International Encyclopedia of the Social and Behavioral Sciences (2nd ed.). P. 764—769. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-08-097086-8.32181-X.

Principi A., Fabbietti P., Lamura G. (2015) Perceived Qualities of Older Workers and Age Management in Companies. Does the Age of HR Managers Matter? Personnel Review. Vol. 44. No. 5. P. 801—820. https://doi.org/10.1108/PR-09-2013-0158.

Ren S., Chadee D. (2020) Influence of Career Identity on Ethical Leadership: Sense-Making Through Communication. Personnel Review. Vol. 49. No. 9. P. 1987—2005. https://doi.org/10.1108/PR-04-2019-0192.

Sabat I. E., Goldberg C., King E. B., Dawson J., Zhang L. (2020) Pygmalion in the Pipeline: How Managers’ Perceptions Influence Racial Differences in Turnover. Human Resource Management. Vol. 60. No. 4. P. 603—616. https://doi.org/10.1002/hrm.22044.

Shore L. M., Cleveland J. N., Sanchez D. (2018) Inclusive Workplaces: A Review and Model. Human Resource Management Review. Vol. 28. No. 2. P. 176—189. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.hrmr.2017.07.003.

Vedres B., Vasarhelyi O. (2023) Inclusion Unlocks the Creative Potential of Gender Diversity in Teams. Scientific Reports. Vol. 13. Art. 13757. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-023-39922-9.

Weber K., Glynn M. A. (2006) Making Sense with Institutions: Context, Thought and Action in Karl Weick’s Theory. Organization Studies. Vol. 27. No. 11. P. 1639—1660. https://doi.org/10.1177/0170840606068343.

Weick K. E. (1995) Sensemaking in Organizations. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.

Weick K., Sutcliffe K., Obstfeld D. (2005) Organizing and the Process of Sensemaking. Organization Science. Vol. 16. No. 4. P. 327—451. https://doi.org/10.1287/orsc.1050.0133.

Weiss J. K., Bottling M., Karner T. (2023) Professional Identification in the Beginning of a Teacher’s Career: A Longitudinal Study on Identity Formation and the Basic Psychological Need for Autonomy in VET Teacher Training. Frontiers in Psychology. Vol. 14. Art. 1196473. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1196473.

Zitek E. M., Hebl M. R. (2007) The Role of Social Norm Clarity in the Influenced Expression of Prejudice Over Time. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology. Vol. 43. No. 6. P. 867—876. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jesp.2006.10.010.

Zhang W., Liao S., Liao J., Zheng Q. (2021) Paradoxical Leadership and Employee Task Performance: A Sense-Making Perspective. Frontiers in Psychology. Vol. 12. Art. 753116. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2021.753116.

* «Международное общественное движение ЛГБТ» признано Верховным судом РФ экстремистской организацией и запрещено.

Published

2024-09-10

How to Cite

Antonova В. К., Aleksandrova М. Ю., Prisyazhniuk Д. И., & Ryabichenko Т. А. (2024). Professional Identity of HR Manager as a Factor of Inclusive Hiring and Development of Women in Russian Companies. Monitoring of Public Opinion: Economic and Social Changes, (4). https://doi.org/10.14515/monitoring.2024.4.2560

Issue

Section

SOCIOLOGY OF MANAGEMENT