«I Gave Birth and Decided...»: Mechanics of Choosing Entrepreneurial Strategies among Russian Mothers
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.14515/monitoring.2024.3.2528Keywords:
motherhood, mumpreneurship, “non-maternal” practices of mothers, gender, choice, alienation, assemblageAbstract
The study regards the mechanics of decision-making about entrepreneurial practices and factors defining the choice of various entrepreneurial strategies by Russian women raising young children. Theoretically, the study relies on the provisions of modern social topology in the reading of John Law and the assemblage theory based on works by Manuel DeLanda and Igor Krasavin. These grounds make it possible to consider maternal entrepreneurship in terms of variable self-organization, implying changes in the relations, objectivity, and the chronotope of a woman. The authors refer to the concept of alienation, since the general orientation towards entrepreneurial activity and the tactics of projects implemented by mothers are associated with the choice in favor of full production cycles (control over the means of production, product sales and appropriation of the results of activity), and the practices of monetization have emancipatory potential.
Empirically, the study bases on the cases of entrepreneurial stories of mothers, materials from maternal forums and communities (248 relevant statements of mothers), and in-depth interviews with mothers (n = 20, Sverdlovsk region). Data was collected in March 2022 — May 2023. The analysis of these data allowed the authors to reveal a repertoire of key entrepreneurial practices by sphere, degree of organization, and forms of implementation, to outline changes in the chronotope of mothers, to list key motives for maternal entrepreneurship, and to identify two most common entrepreneurial strategies. These are artisanal (careful) stategy, characterized by localism, arrhythmicity, attention to the product and its production procedures, low investment, and high comfort, and managerial (brave) strategy, focused on organizational processes, profit growth, investments, and market expansion. The choice of entrepreneurial activity is determined by the to balance employment and family, and the desire to overcome complex alienation. Factors such as institutional conditions, household support, and nurturing environment can influence the forms of entrepreneurship in different ways. However, the intensity of entrepreneurship is a matter of choice rather than necessity, and it is consciously regulated by mothers. The paper describes the features fundamental to the phenomenon of maternal entrepreneurship in Russia, namely, the individual-problematic nature of entrepreneurial practices, their swiftness, process orientation, intuitiveness, focus on control of all stages of the entrepreneurial cycle, and social orientation of activity.
Acknowledgments. The research was supported by the Russian Science Foundation. Project No. 22-28-00636 «Modern "non-maternal" practices of young mothers: repertoire, potential and social risk».
References
Алборов С. В. Суррогатное материнство как предпринимательская деятельность суррогатной матери // Семейный бизнес & самозанятые: взгляд через призму малого предпринимательства / Отв. ред.: А. А. Власов, А. Н. Левушкин. М.: Проспект, 2021. С. 351―361.
Alborov S. V. (2021) Surrogate Motherhood as an Entrepreneurial Activity of a Surrogate Mother. In: Vlasov A. A., Levushkin A. N. (eds.) Family Business & Self-Employed: Looking through the Prism of Small Business. Moscow: Prospect. P. 351―361. (In Russ.)
Бессчетнова О. В., Крекова М. М., Арзамасова Е. Л. Женское предпринимательство в России: pro et contra? // Экономика, предпринимательство и право. 2020. Т. 10. № 12. С. 3059―3074. https://doi.org/10.18334/epp.10.12.111499.
Besschetnova O.V., Krekova M.M., Arzamasova E.L. (2020) Women’s Entrepreneurship in Russia: Pro et Contra? Journal of Economics, Entrepreneurship and Law. Vol. 10. No. 12. Р. 3059―3074. https://doi.org/10.18334/epp.10.12.111499. (In Russ.)
Горозия В. Е. Проблема отчуждения человека в учении Карла Маркса // Человек. Государство. Глобализация. Вып. 3: сборник философских статей / Под ред. В. В. Парцвания. СПб.: Санкт-Петербургское философское общество, 2005. C. 98―117.
Gorozia V. E. (2005) The Problem of Human Alienation in the Teachings of Karl Marx. In: Partsvania V. V. (ed.) Man. State. Globalization. Vol. 3: Collection of Philosophical Articles. Saint Petersburg: St. Petersburg Philosophical Society. P. 98―117. (In Russ.)
Дьячкова О. А., Харькова О. А. Причины, по которым современные женщины занимаются предпринимательской деятельностью: качественное исследование // Инновационная наука. 2021. № 8—1. С. 72―74.
Dyachkova O. A., Kharkova O. A. (2021) The Reasons Why Modern Women are Engaged in Entrepreneurial Activities: A Qualitative Study. Innovative Science. No. 8―1. Р. 72―74. (In Russ.)
Ершова И. В. Женское предпринимательство: от эмпирики и доктрины к правовому регулированию // Lex russica. 2022. Т. 75. № 8. С. 9―22. https://doi.org/10.17803/1729-5920.2022.189.8.009-022.
Ershova I. V. (2022) Female Entrepreneurship: From Empirics and Doctrine to Legal Regulation. Lex russica. Vol. 75. No. 8. Р. 9―22. https://doi.org/10.17803/1729-5920.2022.189.8.009-022. (In Russ.)
Исаченко Н. Н. Отчуждение как социальный феномен современного общества // Вестник Челябинского государственного университета. Философские науки. 2018. № 5. С. 66―70. https://doi.org/10.24411/1994-2796-2018-10508.
Isachenko N. N. (2018) Alienation as a Social Phenomenon of Modern Society. Bulletin of Chelyabinsk State University. Philosophy Sciences. No. 5. Р. 66―70. https://doi.org/10.24411/1994-2796-2018-10508. (In Russ.)
Красавин И. В. Устройство сборки, или Симуляция онтологии у Мануэля Деланда // Социология власти. 2019. Т. 31. № 2. С. 136―154.
Krasavin I. V. (2019) Assemblage Arrangement, or Manuel Delanda’s Simulation of Ontology. Sociology of Power. Vol. 31. No. 2. Р. 136―154. (In Russ.)
Лефевр В. А. Высшие ценности и формальная теория выбора // Вопросы философии. 2012. № 4. С. 154―157.
Lefebvre V. A. (2012) The Supreme Values and Formal Theory of the Choice. Problems of Philosophy. No. 4. P. 154―157. (In Russ.)
Райманова З. И. Развитие женского предпринимательства в современной России // Экономика и управление: научно-практический журнал. 2019. № 1. С. 102―104.
Raimanova Z. I. (2019) Development of Women’s Entrepreneurship in Modern Russia. Economics and Management: Scientific and Practical Journal. No. 1. Р. 102―104. (In Russ.)
Швецова А. В., Симонова И. А. Пока ребенок спит: репертуар «нематеринских» практик российских матерей // Социологическое обозрение. 2024. Т. 23. № 1. С. 185―211. https://doi.org/10.17323/1728-192x-2024-1-185-211.
Shvetsova A. V., Simonova I. A. (2024) While the Child Sleeps: The Repertoire of “Non-Maternal” Practices of Russian Mothers. Russian Sociological Review. Vol. 23. No. 1. P. 185―211. https://doi.org/10.17323/1728-192x-2024-1-185-211. (In Russ.)
Шумпетер Й.А. Теория экономического развития. Капитализм, социализм и демократия. М.: Эксмо, 2008.
Schumpeter J.A. (2008) Theory of Economic Development. Capitalism, Socialism and Democracy. Moscow: Eksmo. (In Russ.)
Чернова Ж. В. Баланс семьи и работы: политика и индивидуальные стратегии матерей // Журнал исследований социальной политики. 2012. Т. 10. № 3. С. 295―308.
Chernova Zh. V. (2012) The Work-Family Balance: Politics and Individual Mothers’ Strategies. The Journal of Social Policy Studies. Vol. 10. No. 3. P. 295―308. (In Russ.)
Astin H. S. (1984) The Meaning of Work in Women’s Lives: A Sociopsychological Model of Career Choice and Work Behavior. The Counseling Psychologist. Vol. 12. No. 4. Р. 117―126. https://doi.org/10.1177/0011000084124002.
Dhaliwal A. (2022) The Mompreneurship Phenomenon: An Examination of the Antecedents and Challenges of Mothers in Business. International Journal of Service Science, Management, Engineering, and Technology (IJSSMET). Vol. 13. No. 1. P. 1―17. http://doi.org/10.4018/IJSSMET.290334.
Duberley J., Carrigan M. (2012) The Career Identities of ‘Mumpreneurs’: Women’s Experiences of Combining Enterprise and Motherhood. International Small Business Journal. Vol. 31. No. 6. Р. 629―651. https://doi.org/10.1177/0266242611435182.
Durrah D. (2016) Mompreneur Networks in Germany: Multiple-Case Study on How Women Entrepreneurs Utilize a Mompreneur Network In Germany. Master’s thesis. Enschede: University of Twente.
Ettl K., Welter F. (2010) Gender, Context and Entrepreneurial Learning. International Journal of Gender and Entrepreneurship. Vol. 19. No. 2. Р. 108―129. https://doi.org/10.1108/17566261011050991.
Fajardo C. (2021) Mystified Alienation: A Discussion between Marx, Foucault and Federici. tripleC: Communication, Capitalism & Critique. Journal for a Global Sustainable Information Society. Vol. 19. No. 2. Р. 287―300. https://doi.org/10.31269/triplec.v19i2.1277.
Foley M., Baird M., Cooper R., Williamson S. (2018) Is Independence Really an Opportunity? The Experience of Entrepreneur-Mothers. Journal of Small Business and Enterprise Development. Vol. 25. No. 2. Р. 313―329. https://doi.org/10.1108/JSBED-10-2017-0306.
Hagen E. E. (1963) How Economic Growth Begins: A Theory of Social Change. Journal of Social Issues. Vol 19. No. 1. P. 20―34. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-4560.1963.tb00428.x.
Harris C., Lopes Morrison R., Lewis K., Ho M. (2012) Recreating Boundaries in Boundaryless Careers: The Career Transitions of Mompreneurs. Academy of Management Proceedings. Vol. 2012. No. 1.
p. 13278 https://doi.org/10.5465/AMBPP.2012.13278abstract
Haslanger S. (1995) Ontology and Social Construction. Philosophical Topics. Vol. 23. No. 2. Р. 95―125. https://doi.org/10.5840/philtopics19952324.
Hudson Breen R., Aegean L. (2020) Choosing Mothering and Entrepreneurship: A Relational Career-Life Process. International Journal of Gender and Entrepreneurship. Vol. 12. No. 3. Р. 253―271. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJGE-08-2019-0130.
Hughes K. D. (2006) Exploring Motivation and Success among Canadian Women Entrepreneurs. Journal of Small Business and Entrepreneurship. Vol. 19. Р. 107―120. https://doi.org/10.1080/08276331.2006.10593362.
Jaeggi R., Neuhouser F. (2014) Alienation. New York Chichester, West Sussex: Columbia University Press. https://doi.org/10.7312/jaeg15198.
Law J. (1999) After Ant: Complexity, Naming and Topology. The Sociological Review. Vol. 47. No. 1. P. 1―14. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-954X.1999.tb03479.x.
Lewis P., Rumens N., Simpson R. (2022) Postfeminism, Hybrid Mumpreneur Identities and the Reproduction of Masculine Entrepreneurship. International Small Business Journal. Vol. 40. No. 1. Р. 68―89. https://doi.org/10.1177/02662426211013791.
Markowska M. (2018) Motherhood as a Springboard for Women’s Entrepreneurial Action. In: Green P., Brush C. (eds.) A Research Agenda for Women and Entrepreneurship: Identity through Aspirations, Behaviors and Confidence. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar Publishing. P. 187―206.
Mayes R., Williams P., McDonald P. (2020) Mums with Cameras: Technological Change, Entrepreneurship and Motherhood. Gender, Work & Organization. Vol. 27. No. 6. Р. 1468―1484. https://doi.org/10.1111/gwao.12526.
McGowan P., Redeker C. L., Cooper S. Y., Greenan K. (2012) Female Entrepreneurship and the Management of Business and Domestic Roles: Motivations, Expectations and Realities. Entrepreneurship & Regional Development. Vol. 24. No. 1―2. P. 53―72. https://doi.org/10.1080/08985626.2012.637351.
Muhamad S., Rashid N. K. A., Hussain N. E., Akhir N. H. M., Ahmat N. (2020) Resilience as a Moderator of Government and Family Support in Explaining Entrepreneurial Interest and Readiness among Single Mothers. Journal of Business Venturing Insights. Vol. 13. Art. e00157. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbvi.2020.e00157.
Nel P., Maritz A., Thongprovati O. (2010) Motherhood and Entrepreneurship: The Mumpreneur Phenomenon. International Journal of Organizational Innovation. Vol. 3. No. 1. P. 6―34.
Parlapiano E. H.,Cobe P. (1996) Mompreneurs: A Mother’s Practical Step-by-step Guide to Work-at-home. New York, NY: Berkley Publishing Group.
Richomme-Huet K., Vial V., d’Andria A. (2013) Mumpreneurship: A New Concept for an Old Phenomenon? International Journal of Entrepreneurship and Small Business. Vol. 19. No. 2. Р. 251―275.
Sengupta Dawn, L. (2023) (Re)Exploration of the Influence of Marxist Feminism on 21st-Century Women in the Workplace. IJNRD. Vol. 8. No. 5. URL: https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=4500085 (accessed: 19.06.2024).
Stevenson H. H., Sahlman W. A. (eds) (1991) Introduction to the Entrepreneurial Venture. Boston, MA: Harvard Business School Press.
Takseva T. (2019) One Is Not Born but Rather Becomes a Mother: Claiming the Maternal in Women and Gender Studies. Journal of the Motherhood Initiative. Vol. 10. No. 1―2. P. 27―44.
Žižek S. (2008) The Sublime Object of Ideology. London: Verso.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2024 Monitoring of Public Opinion: Economic and Social Changes
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.