Regional Models of the Mediatization of Religion: A Comparative Analysis of Orthodox and Islamic Telegram Channels in the Volgograd Region
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.14515/monitoring.2026.3.3202Keywords:
religious mediatization, digital religious publicity, post-secular publicity, Telegram, Orthodoxy, Islam, Volgograd Region, media strategies, religious leaders, digital mediaAbstract
This article offers a comparative analysis of regional models of the mediatization of religion within the emerging post-secular digital public sphere, using the Volgograd Region as a case study. The research seeks to identify the distinctive features of the digital communication strategies adopted by Orthodox and Muslim religious leadership and to explain the differences in their modes of public presence in the contemporary digital media environment. The study is designed as a comparative case study combining the analysis of digital communication practices with qualitative interviews. The empirical material comprises the complete corpus of publications posted on the official Telegram channels of Metropolitan Feodor of Volgograd and Kamyshin and Mufti Kifah Mohammad Bata of the Volgograd Region between March 2022 and November 2025, as well as two semi-structured interviews with individuals involved in shaping digital religious communication in the region. The analysis draws on quantitative content analysis, qualitative discourse analysis, and comparative analysis of digital communication strategies. The findings demonstrate that although the digital communication practices of Orthodox and Muslim religious leadership are shaped by the common media logic of digital platforms, they retain distinct confessional characteristics. The Orthodox model is primarily oriented toward maintaining internal religious communication, preserving traditional forms of spiritual guidance, and reinforcing institutional religious authority. By contrast, the Muslim model places greater emphasis on public engagement, social and educational initiatives, interfaith dialogue, and communication with younger audiences. The interview data further reveal that these differences are determined not only by the affordances of digital media but also by the religious leaders’ differing understandings of the purposes, functions, and boundaries of their presence in digital space. The study concludes that the mediatization of religion at the regional level is a differentiated process in which digital platforms do not erase confessional distinctions but instead contribute to the emergence of distinct models of religious presence in the digital public sphere, reflecting different forms of religious leadership, communicative practices, and patterns of audience engagement.
References
Беликова Е. О. Толерантность как ценность в социокультурном ландшафте региона / Е. О. Беликова // Logos et Praxis. 2020. Т. 19. № 1. С. 107-116. https://doi.org/10.15688/lp.jvolsu.2020.1.11.
Belikova E. O. (2020) Tolerance as a Value in the Sociocultural Landscape of the Region. Logos et Praxis. Vol. 19. No. 1. P. 107–116. https://doi.org/10.15688/lp.jvolsu.2020.1.11. (In Russ.)
Гришаева Е., Шумкова В. Теории среднего уровня в исследовании религии и медиа: медиатизация, медиация и RSST // Государство, религия, церковь в России и за рубежом. 2020. Т. 38. № 2. С. 7—40.
Grishaeva E., Shumkova V. (2020) Middle-Range Theories in Religion and Media Studies: Mediation, Mediatization and RSST. Gosudarstvo, Religiia, Tserkov’ v Rossii i zaRubezhom. Vol. 38. No. 2. P. 7—40. (In Russ.)
Островская Е. А. Миссия выполнима: православные батюшки-блогеры // Концепт: философия, религия, культура. 2021. Т. 5. № 1. С. 44—59. https://doi.org/10.24833/2541-8831-2021-1-17-44-59.
Ostrovskaya E. A. (2021) Mission Possible: Russian Orthodox Priest Blog. Concept: Philosophy, Religion, Culture. Vol. 5. No. 1. P. 44—59. https://doi.org/10.24833/2541-8831-2021-1-17-44-59. (In Russ.)
Островская Е. А. Альтернативный медиадискурс об РПЦ: православные Telegram-каналы // Мониторинг общественного мнения: экономические и социальные перемены. 2022. № 2. С. 454—476. https://doi.org/10.14515/monitoring.2022.2.2046.
Ostrovskaya E. A. (2022) Alternative Media Discourse about the ROC: Orthodox Telegram Channels. Monitoring of Public Opinion: Economic and Social Changes. No. 2. P. 454—476. https://doi.org/10.14515/monitoring.2022.2.2046. (In Russ.)
Островская Е. А. Институциональный подход социологического изучения медиатизации: концептуальные составляющие и примеры исследований // Медиалингвистика. 2023. Т. 10. № 4. С. 598—620.
Ostrovskaya E. A. (2023) Institutional Approach to the Sociological Study of Mediatization: Conceptual Components and Research Examples. Medialinguistics. Vol. 10. No. 4. P. 598—620. (In Russ.)
Островская Е. А., Бадмацыренов Т. Б. Сетевые технологии как инструмент самопрезентации малых религиозных групп (кейс новых для России направлений буддизма) // Вестник Института социологии. 2024. Т. 15. № 3. С. 79—106.
Ostrovskaya E. A., Badmatsyrenov T. B. (2024) Network Technologies as a Tool for Self-Presentation of Small Religious Groups (Case of New Buddhist Movements in Russia). Bulletin of the Institute of Sociology. Vol. 15. No. 3. P. 79—106. (In Russ.)
Лёвхейм М. Медиатизация религии: критическая оценка // Государство, религия, церковь в России и за рубежом. 2020. Т. 38. № 2. С. 76—97.
Lövheim M. (2020) Mediatisation of Religion: A Critical Appraisal. State, Religion and Church in Russia and Worldwide. Vol. 38. No. 2. P. 76—97. (In Russ.)
Плещенко А. Н., Беликова Е. О., Дулина Н. В. Пространственная идентичность как конструкт социокультурного ландшафта региона (на примере Волгоградской области) // Primo Aspectu. 2022. № 4. С. 31—38. https://doi.org/10.35211/2500-2635-2022-4-52-31-38.
Pleshchenko A. N., Belikova E. O., Dulina N. V. (2022) Spatial Identity as a Construct of the Sociocultural Landscape of the Region (On the Example of the Volgograd Region). Primo Aspectu. No. 4. P. 31—38. https://doi.org/10.35211/2500-2635-2022-4-52-31-38. (In Russ.)
Сгибнева О. И., Беликова Е. О. Современные религиозные процессы в регионе: опыт эмпирического исследования в Волгоградской области // Народы и религии Евразии. 2023. Т. 28. № 2. С. 167—180. https://doi.org/10.14258/nreur(2023)2-09.
Sgibneva O. I., Belikova E. O. (2023) Contemporary Religious Processes in the Region: Empirical Research Experience in Volgograd Region. Peoples and Religions of Eurasia. Vol. 28. No. 2. P. 167—180. https://doi.org/10.14258/nreur(2023)2-09. (In Russ.)
Узланер Д. Постсекулярный поворот. Как мыслить о религии в XXI веке. М.: Издательство Института Гайдара, 2020.
Uslaner D. (2020) Postsecular Turn: How to Think About Religion in the 21st Century. Moscow: Gaidar Institute. (In Russ.)
Хьярвард С. Три формы медиатизированной религии: изменение облика религии в публичном пространстве // Государство, религия, церковь в России и за рубежом. 2020. № 2. С. 41—75.
Hjarvard S. (2020) Three Forms of Mediatized Religion: Changing the Face of Religion in the Public Space. Gosudarstvo, Religiia, Tserkov’ v Rossii i za Rubezhom. No. 2. P. 41—75. (In Russ.)
Campbell H. (2021) Digital Creatives and the Rethinking of Religious Authority. New York, NY: Routledge.
Campbell H. (2016) Framing the Human-Technology Relationship: How Religious Digital Creatives Engage Posthuman Narratives. Social Compass. Vol. 63. No. 3. P. 302—318. https://doi.org/10.1177/0037768616652328.
Hepp A., Krönert V. (2009) Medien — Event — Religion: Die Mediatisierung des Religiösen. Wiesbaden: VS Verlag für Sozialwissenschaften. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-531-91548-7.
Hjarvard S. (2013) The Mediatization of Culture and Society. London; New York, NY: Routledge.
Hjarvard S. (2014) Mediatization and Cultural and Social Change: An Institutional Perspective. In: Lundby K. (ed.) Mediatization of Communication. Berlin; Boston, MA: De Gruyter Mouton. P. 199—226. https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110272215.199.
Lövheim M., Axner M. (2015) Mediatised Religion and Public Spheres: Current Approaches and New Questions. In: Granholm K., Moberg M., Sjö S. (eds.) Religion, Media, and Social Change. London: Routledge. P. 38—53. http://dx.doi.org/10.4324/9781315814339.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Екатерина Олеговна Беликова

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.




