“There, Beyond the Horizon...” Young Scientists on the Road from the past Through the Lived Present to an Imagined Future
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.14515/monitoring.2026.5.3364Keywords:
young researchers, generational segment, temporal turn in youth sociology, search for resilience, lived present, haunts of the past, imagined futureAbstract
This article discusses young people's perceptions of the future in the context of their present and past memories. The analysis focuses on a generational segment of young scientists at a leading Russian university, whose participation in constructing the future is actively supported by state rhetoric and university policy. The theoretical framework is formed at the intersection of the temporal turn in the sociology of youth, the incorporation of the past into understandings of the future, and the critical debate regarding generations and growing up. The article's empirical basis consists of 30 semi-structured interviews with young scientists at the Higher School of Economics, aged 20-35, working in the university's research structures across various fields. The author analyzes strategies for coping with uncertainty and the search for resilience through increased agency in managing life choices. The analysis reveals that young scholars construct visions of the future and define its horizons by taking into account their positions within the contemporary university— characterized by precarious employment, high demands for academic output, and financial instability — while drawing upon their lived present, references to the past (personal, familial, and national), their generational identity, and their standing within the professional scientific field. In this process, the past serves as evidence of one’s resilience, while the primary resource in the present becomes one’s engagement with science, alongside personal qualities such as the capacity to navigate difficulties and contemporary challenges, and a commitment to pursuing one’s chosen professional identity — traits linked to professional dedication and a drive for recognition. The author concludes that, although the narratives of young scientists contain a mix of optimistic and pessimistic expectations regarding the future, the emphasis placed on a sense of calling renders these envisioned scenarios optimistic within the broader sociocultural context.
Acknowledgements. This article draws on materials from the project “Generation Z in Search of Balance: Working Conditions, Work Schedules, and Life Values as Perceived by Young People and Employers” (HSE PFI 2024). The author would like to thank her colleagues Nadezhda Nartova, Irina Lisovskaya, Evgeniya Kuziner, and Ekaterina Semenova for their valuable input.
References
Андреева А. С., Омельченко Е. Л. День Победы сквозь эпохи: память и практики коммеморации // Социологические исследования. 2025. № 5. С. 3–13. https://doi.org/10.7868/S3034601025050017.
Andreeva A. S., Omelchenko E. L. (2025) Victory Day Through the Eras: Memory and Commemoration Practices. Sociological Studies. No. 5. P. 3–13. https://doi.org/10.7868/S3034601025050017. (In Russ.)
Банько А.А. Адаптация молодых сотрудников в российских научных коллективах // Мониторинг общественного мнения: экономические и социальные перемены. 2026. № 2. С. 46—66. https://doi.org/10.14515/monitoring.2026.2.3063.
Banko A. A. (2026) Adaptation of Young Staff in Russian Academic Teams. Monitoring of Public Opinion: Economic and Social Changes. No. 2. P. 46–66. https://doi.org/10.14515/monitoring.2026.2.3063. (In Russ.)
Бургос М. История жизни. Рассказывание и поиск себя // Вопросы социологии. 1992. Т. 1. № 2. С. 123–130.
Burgos M. (1992) Life History. Storytelling and the Search for Oneself. Voprosy Sociologii. Vol. 1. No. 2. P. 123–130. (In Russ.)
Дежина И. Г. Научная политика в России в 2018–2022 гг.: противоречивые сигналы // Социологический журнал. 2023. Т. 29. № 2. С. 132–149. https://doi.org/10.19181/socjour.2023.29.2.10.
Dezhina I. G. (2023) Science Policy in Russia in 2018–2022: Contradictory Signals. Sociological Journal. Vol. 29. No. 2. P. 132–149. https://doi.org/10.19181/socjour.2023.29.2.10. (In Russ.)
Кузьминов Я. И., Юдкевич М. М. Университеты в России: как это работает. М.: Изд. дом Высшей школы экономики, 2021.
Kuzminov Y. I., Yudkevich M. M. (2021) Universities in Russia: How It Works. Moscow: HSE University Publishing House. (In Russ.)
Мангейм К. Очерки социологии знания. М.: ИНИОН РАН, 2000.
Mannheim K. (2000) Essays on the Sociology of Knowledge. Moscow: INION RAN. (In Russ.)
Митрофанова Е. С. (Не)время взрослеть: как меняется возраст наступления дебютных биографических событий у россиян // Демографическое обозрение. 2020. Т. 7. № 4. С. 36–61. https://doi.org/10.17323/demreview.v7i4.12043.
Mitrofanova E. S. (2020) (No)Time to Grow Up: Changing Ages of Debut Biographical Events in Russia. Demographic Review. Vol. 7. No. 4. P. 36–61. https://doi.org/10.17323/demreview.v7i4.12043. (In Russ.)
Нартова Н. Метафорические основания поколенческого воображаемого городской российской молодежи // Интеракция. Интервью. Интерпретация. 2024. Т. 16. № 2. С. 29–49. https://doi.org/10.19181/inter.2024.16.2.2.
Nartova N. (2024). Metaphorical Foundations of the Generational Imaginary of Urban Russian Youth. Interaction. Interview. Interpretation. Vol. 16. No. 2. P. 29–49. https://doi.org/10.19181/inter.2024.16.2.2. (In Russ.)
Омельченко Е. Л. Забытое поколение Х. Ретроспективный взгляд из будущего // Интеракция. Интервью. Интерпретация. 2024. Т. 16. № 2. С. 10–28. https://doi.org/10.19181/inter.2024.16.2.1.
Omelchenko E. L. (2024) The Forgotten Generation X. A Retrospective View from the Future. Interaction. Interview. Interpretation. Vol. 16. No. 2. P. 10–28. https://doi.org/10.19181/inter.2024.16.2.1. (In Russ.)
Радаев В. В. Откладывают ли молодые поколения свое взросление, и в чем это проявляется // Демографическое обозрение. 2025. Т. 12. № 4. С. 4–44. https://doi.org/10.17323/demreview.v12i4.30411.
Radaev V. V. (2025) Do Younger Generations Postpone Their Transition to Adulthood, and How Does It Manifest. Demographic Review. Vol. 12. No. 4. P. 4–44. https://doi.org/10.17323/demreview.v12i4.30411. (In Russ.)
Швецова А. В., Симонова А. А., Давыдова Н. Н. Воспроизводство кадрового потенциала науки в оценке молодых российских ученых: результаты прикладного исследования // Мониторинг общественного мнения: экономические и социальные перемены. 2020. № 5. С. 248—268. https://doi.org/10.14515/monitoring.2020.5.736.
Shvetsova A. V., Simonova A. A., Davydova N. N. (2020) Reproduction of Human Resource Potential in Science in the Assessments of Young Russian Scientists: Results of an Applied Study. Monitoring of Public Opinion: Economic and Social Changes. No. 5. P. 248—268. https://doi.org/10.14515/monitoring.2020.5.736. (In Russ.)
Ярская-Смирнова Е. Р. Нарративный анализ в социологии // Социологический журнал. 1997. Т. 3. С. 38–61.
Iarskaia-Smirnova E. R. (1997) Narrative Analysis in Sociology. Sociological Journal. Vol. 3. P. 38–61. (In Russ.)
Alexander P., Loewenthal J., Butt G. (2020) ‘Fuck It, Shit Happens (FISH)’: A Social Generations Approach to Understanding Young People’s Imaginings of Life After School in 2016–2017. Journal of Youth Studies. Vol. 23. No. 1. P. 109–126. https://doi.org/10.1080/13676261.2019.1704406.
Anderson B. (2010) Preemption, Precaution, Preparedness: Anticipatory Action and Future Geographies. Progress in Human Geography. Vol. 34. No. 6. P. 777–798. https://doi.org/10.1177/0309132510362600.
Andreeva A. S. (2026) The Neoliberalization of Academia: A Focus on Young Russian Researchers’ Work–Life (Im)Balance. International Journal of Sociology and Social Policy. P. 1–14. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJSSP-11-2025-0773.
Andreeva A. S., Omelchenko E. L., Sorokin, P. S. (2025) Prefiguration, Resilience and Transitions to Adulthood: Russian Youth in Times of Uncertainty. Young. Vol. 33. No. 3. P. 278–295. https://doi.org/10.1177/11033088241289209.
Ansell N., Hajdu F., van Blerk L., Robson E. (2014) Reconceptualising Temporality in Young Lives: Exploring Young People’s Current and Future Livelihoods in AIDS-Affected Southern Africa. Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers. Vol. 39. No. 3. P. 387–401. https://doi.org/10.1111/tran.12041.
Arnett J. J. (2016) Does Emerging Adulthood Theory Apply across Social Classes? National Data on a Persistent Question. Emerging Adulthood. Vol. 4. No. 4. P. 227–235. https://doi.org/10.1177/2167696815613000.
Berardi F. (2017) Futurability: The Age of Impotence and the Horizon of Possibility. London: Verso Books.
Berg L. D., Huijbens E. H., Larsen H. G. (2016) Producing Anxiety in the Neoliberal University. The Canadian Geographer. Vol. 60. No. 2. P. 168–180. https://doi.org/10.1111/cag.12261.
Bishop E., Willis K. (2014) ‘Without Hope Everything Would Be Doom and Gloom’: Young People Talk About the Importance of Hope in Their Lives. Journal of Youth Studies. Vol. 17. No. 6. P. 778–793. https://doi.org/10.1080/13676261.2013.878788.
Bone D. (2019) ‘I Don’t Want to Be a Vagrant for the Rest of My Life’: Young Peoples’ Experiences of Precarious Work as a ‘Continuous Present’. Journal of Youth Studies. Vol. 22. No. 9. P. 1218–1237. https://doi.org/10.1080/13676261.2019.1570097.
Brannen J., Nilsen A. (2002) Young People’s Time Perspectives: From Youth to Adulthood. Sociology. Vol. 36. No. 3. P. 513–537. https://doi.org/10.1177/0038038502036003002.
Bristow J. (2021) Post-Brexit Boomer Blaming: The Contradictions of Generational Grievance. The Sociological Review. Vol. 69. No. 4. P. 759–774. https://doi.org/10.1177/0038026119899882.
Burton S., Bowman B. (2022) The Academic Precariat: Understanding Life and Labour in the Neoliberal Academy. British Journal of Sociology of Education. Vol. 43. No. 4. P. 497–512. https://doi.org/10.1080/01425692.2022.2076387.
Carabelli G., Lyon D. (2016) Young People’s Orientations to the Future: Navigating the Present and Imagining the Future. Journal of Youth Studies. Vol. 19. No. 8. P. 1110–1127. https://doi.org/10.1080/13676261.2016.1145641.
Coleman R., Tutton R. (2017) Introduction to Special Issue of Sociological Review on Futures in Question: Theories, Methods, Practices. The Sociological Review. Vol. 65. No. 3. P. 440–447. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-954X.12448.
Cook J., Mee K. J., Cooper J. (2025) The Relational Work of Constructing the Future: Drawing Together Youth and Parent Perspectives. Journal of Youth Studies. Vol. 29. No. 4. P. 527–542. https://doi.org/10.1080/13676261.2025.2471802.
Corsten M. (1999) The Time of Generations. Time and Society. Vol. 8. No. 2–3. P. 249–272. https://doi.org/10.1177/0961463X99008002003.
Côté J. E. (2000) Arrested Adulthood: The Changing Nature of Maturity and Identity. New York: New York University Press.
Derrida J. (1994) Specters of Marx: The State of the Debt, the Work of Mourning, and the New International. New York, NY: Routledge.
Gordon A. (2011) Some Thoughts on Haunting and Futurity. Borderlands. Vol. 10. No. 2. P. 1–21. https://www.jstor.org/stable/48782437.
Hoolachan J., McKee K., Moore T., Soaita A. M. (2017) ‘Generation Rent’ and the Ability to ‘Settle Down’: Economic and Geographical Variation in Young People’s Housing Transitions. Journal of Youth Studies. Vol. 20. No. 1. P. 63–78. https://doi.org/10.1080/13676261.2016.1184241.
Karmaeva N. (2018) Career Aspirations of Young Academics in Russia. European Education. Vol. 50. No. 3. P. 283–299. https://doi.org/10.1080/10564934.2018.1446177.
Knappe H., Renn O. (2022) Politicisation of Intergenerational Justice: How Youth Actors Translate Sustainable Futures. European Journal of Futures Research. Vol. 10. No. 6. P. 1–11. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40309-022-00194-7.
Leccardi C. (2005) Facing Uncertainty: Temporality and Biographies in the New Century. Young. Vol. 13. No. 2. P. 123–146. https://doi.org/10.1177/1103308805051317.
Lyon D., Crow G. (2012) The Challenges and Opportunities of Restudying Community on Sheppey: Young People’s Imagined Futures. The Sociological Review. Vol. 60. No. 3. P. 498–517. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-954X.2012.02096.x.
McPherson Ch. (2025) Considering the Past, Present and Future: Making the Case for a Hauntological Approach to Youth. Journal of Youth Studies. Vol. 28. No. 7. P. 1054–1070. https://doi.org/10.1080/13676261.2024.2328121.
Roberts S., France A. (2021) Problematizing a Popular Panacea: A Critical Examination of the (Continued) Use of ‘Social Generations’ in Youth Sociology. The Sociological Review. Vol. 69. No. 4. P. 775–791. https://doi.org/10.1177/0038026120922467.
Rönnlund M. (2020) ‘I Love This Place, but I Won’t Stay’: Identification with Place and Imagined Spatial Futures Among Youth Living in Rural Areas in Sweden. Young. Vol. 28. No. 2. P. 123–137. https://doi.org/10.1177/1103308818823818.
Rustin M. (2016) The Neoliberal University and Its Alternatives. Soundings. Vol. 63. No. 63. P. 147–176. https://doi.org/10.3898/136266216819377057.
Silva J. M. (2012) Constructing Adulthood in an Age of Uncertainty. American Sociological Review. Vol. 77. No. 4. P. 505–522. https://doi.org/10.1177/0003122412449014.
Threadgold S. (2020) Figures of Youth: On the Very Object of Youth Studies. Journal of Youth Studies. Vol. 23. No. 6. P. 686–701. https://doi.org/10.1080/13676261.2019.1636014.
Tutton R. (2023) The Sociology of Futurelessness. Sociology. Vol. 57. No. 2. P. 438–453. https://doi.org/10.1177/00380385221122420.
Urry J. (2016) What Is the Future? Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley & Sons.
Woodman D. (2011) Young People and the Future: Multiple Temporal Orientations Shaped in Interaction with Significant Others. Young. Vol. 19. No. 2. P. 111–128. https://doi.org/10.1177/110330881001900201.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Елена Леонидовна Омельченко

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.




