Horizons of the Possible: Agency and Reflexivity in Narratives about the Future among College Students in Norilsk

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.14515/monitoring.2026.5.3345

Keywords:

youth transitions, imagined futures, structure and agency, reflexivity, transition to adulthood, Arctic monotown

Abstract

The article aims at identifying modes of constructing imagined futures among students at technical colleges in Norilsk and to examine how these modes combine reflexivity and agency within the local opportunity structure of an Arctic single-industry city. Spatial isolation and the dominance of the city-forming enterprise raise the stakes of biographical decisions and institutionally structure educational and employment trajectories. The empirical material consists of 31 semi-structured interviews with students from two colleges in Norilsk, conducted in September 2024. The analysis employs thematic coding, focusing on agentic moments and forms of reflexive engagement with constraints. The study identifies four modes of constructing imagined futures, namely: “following the well-trodden path,” characterized by the reproduction of a taken-for-granted trajectory and the delegation of decision-making; “a safety choice” involving the instrumental appropriation of an institutionally supported pathway; “negotiations” involving the coordination of local resources, timeframes, and conditions for an earlier relocation; and “two futures,” characterized by the maintenance of parallel scenarios and the limited translation of desired futures into a sequence of concrete steps. The findings demonstrate that the reflexive differentiation of alternatives does not necessarily coincide with the agentic organization of action. The most elaborate differentiation of alternatives is found among respondents whose desired futures are less clearly translated into action, whereas the most practically organized trajectories reproduce the established local pathway without questioning it. This divergence is explained by the asymmetrical distribution of navigational resources within the single-industry city: employment contracts, job placement, practical training, and years of service in the North provide a well-developed institutional infrastructure for one trajectory, while alternatives beyond it lack comparable forms of support. Moving beyond the established local trajectory is possible when additional resources external to the local field are available, enabling young people to connect their desired futures to a sequence of feasible steps. The author concludes that the local opportunity structure shapes not only which futures young people can imagine but also which of these futures they can actively appropriate through their own agency. The divergence between reflexivity and agency should therefore be understood as a structurally reproduced configuration of youth transitions in contexts characterized by the “compressed possible.” The findings contribute to a more nuanced understanding of how local institutional pathways and access to navigational resources shape horizons of aspiration and strategies of youth (im)mobility in Arctic single-industry cities.

Acknowledgments. This article is an output of a research project (HSE-BR-2025-008) implemented as part of the Basic Research Program at HSE University.

 

Author Biography

Daria S. Tolstykh, HSE University

  • HSE University, Moscow, Russia
    • Research Fellow at the Centre for Vocational Education and Skills Development

References

Замятина Н. Ю. Норильск — город фронтира // Вестник Евразии. 2007. № 1. С. 167—192.

Zamyatina N. Yu. (2007) Norilsk — City of the Frontier. Acta Eurasica. No. 1. P. 167—192. (In Russ.)

Зубок Ю. А. Молодежь: жизненные стратегии в новой реальности // Мониторинг общественного мнения: экономические и социальные перемены. 2020. № 3. С. 4—12. https://doi.org/10.14515/monitoring.2020.3.1688.

Zubok J. A. (2020) Youth: Life Strategies in the New Reality. Monitoring of Public Opinion: Economic and Social Changes. No. 3. P. 4—12. https://doi.org/10.14515/monitoring.2020.3.1688. (In Russ.)

Куракин Д., Кусимова Т. Нарративная структура «эскейпа»: прогрессивный нарратив и культурные структуры восходящей мобильности в селективном российском университете // Laboratorium: журнал социальных исследований. 2023. Т. 15. № 3. С. 102—140. https://doi.org/10.25285/2078-1938-2023-15-3-102-140.

Kurakin D., Kusimova T. (2023) Narrative Structures of «Escape»: Progressive Narrative and Cultural Structures of Upward Mobility at an Elite Russian University. Laboratorium: Russian Review of Social Research. Vol. 15. No. 3. P. 102—140. https://doi.org/10.25285/2078-1938-2023-15-3-102-140. (In Russ.)

Недосека Е. В., Шарова Е. Н. Особенности жизненных стратегий молодежи в условиях Арктики // Мониторинг общественного мнения: экономические и социальные перемены. 2020. № 3. С. 355—375. https://doi.org/10.14515/monitoring.2020.3.1611.

Nedoseka E. V., Sharova E. N. (2020) Features of Youth Life Strategies in the Arctic. Monitoring of Public Opinion: Economic and Social Changes. No. 3. P. 355—375. https://doi.org/10.14515/monitoring.2020.3.1611. (In Russ.)

Омельченко Е. Л. Воображаемые горизонты будущего. Жизненные ориентиры и миграционные планы молодежи Северо-Западного региона России // Социологические исследования. 2023. № 12. С. 121—135. .

Omelchenko E. L. (2023) Imagined Horizons of the Future: Life Guidelines and Migration Plans of Young People in Russia’s North-West Region. Sociological Studies. No. 12. P. 121—135. (In Russ.)

Романенко К. Р. «Особого выбора не было»: институциональные условия и культурные нарративы образовательного выбора в моногородах // Мониторинг общественного мнения: экономические и социальные перемены. 2024. № 3. С. 204—229. https://doi.org/10.14515/monitoring.2024.3.2537.

Romanenko K. R. (2024) «There Was No Special Choice»: Institutional Conditions and Cultural Narratives of Educational Choice in Single-Industry Towns. Monitoring of Public Opinion: Economic and Social Changes. No. 3. P. 204—229. https://doi.org/10.14515/monitoring.2024.3.2537. (In Russ.)

Archer M. S. (2007) Making Our Way Through the World: Human Reflexivity and Social Mobility. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511618932.

Atkinson W. (2010) The Myth of the Reflexive Worker: Class and Work Histories in Neo-Liberal Times. Work, Employment and Society. Vol. 24. No. 3. P. 413–429. https://doi.org/10.1177/0950017010371659.

Bourdieu P. (1986) The Forms of Capital. In: Richardson J. G. (ed.) Handbook of Theory and Research for the Sociology of Education. New York, NY: Greenwood Press. P. 241—258.

Braun V., Clarke V. (2006) Using Thematic Analysis in Psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology. Vol. 3. No. 2. P. 77—101. https://doi.org/10.1191/1478088706qp063oa.

Caetano A. (2014) Reflexivity and Social Change: A Critical Discussion of Reflexive Modernization and Individualization Theses. Portuguese Journal of Social Science. Vol. 13. No. 1. P. 93—109. https://doi.org/10.1386/pjss.13.1.93_1.

Caetano A. (2015) Defining Personal Reflexivity: A Critical Reading of Archer’s Approach. European Journal of Social Theory. Vol. 18. No. 1. P. 60—75. https://doi.org/10.1177/1368431014549684.

Carabelli G., Lyon D. (2016) Young People’s Orientations to the Future: Navigating the Present and Imagining the Future. Journal of Youth Studies. Vol. 19. No. 8. P. 1110—1127. https://doi.org/10.1080/13676261.2016.1145641.

Cuzzocrea V. (2020) A Place for Mobility in Metaphors of Youth Transitions. Journal of Youth Studies. Vol. 23. No. 1. P. 61—75. https://doi.org/10.1080/13676261.2019.1703918.

Elder-Vass D. (2007) Reconciling Archer and Bourdieu in an Emergentist Theory of Action. Sociological Theory. Vol. 25. No. 4. P. 325—346. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9558.2007.00312.x.

Emirbayer M., Mische A. (1998) What Is Agency? American Journal of Sociology. Vol. 103. No. 4. P. 962—1023. https://doi.org/10.1086/231294.

Evans K., Furlong A. (1997) Metaphors of Youth Transitions: Niches, Pathways, Trajectories or Navigations. In: Bynner J., Chisholm L., Furlong A. (eds.) Youth, Citizenship and Social Change in a European Context. Aldershot: Ashgate. P. 17—41.

Evans K. (2007) Concepts of Bounded Agency in Education, Work, and the Personal Lives of Young Adults. International Journal of Psychology. Vol. 42. No. 2. P. 85—93. https://doi.org/10.1080/00207590600991237.

Farrugia D. (2013) The Reflexive Subject: Towards a Theory of Reflexivity as Practical Intelligibility. Current Sociology. Vol. 61. No. 3. P. 283—300. https://doi.org/10.1177/0011392113478713.

Harrison N. (2018) Using the Lens of «Possible Selves» to Explore Access to Higher Education: A New Conceptual Model for Practice, Policy, and Research. Social Sciences. Vol. 7. No. 10. Art. 209. https://doi.org/10.3390/socsci7100209.

Laughland-Booÿ J., Mayall M., Skrbiš Z. (2015) Whose Choice? Young People, Career Choices and Reflexivity Re-examined. Current Sociology. Vol. 63. No. 4. P. 586—603. https://doi.org/10.1177/0011392114540671.

Minina E., Pavlenko E. (2023) «Choosing the Lesser of Evils»: Cultural Narrative and Career Decision-Making in Post-Soviet Russia. Journal of Youth Studies. Vol. 26. No. 9. P. 1109—1129. https://doi.org/10.1080/13676261.2022.2071123.

Mische A. (2009) Projects and Possibilities: Researching Futures in Action. Sociological Forum. Vol. 24. No. 3. P. 694—704. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1573-7861.2009.01127.x.

Riessman C. K. (2008) Narrative Methods for the Human Sciences. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE.

Roberts S. (2012) One Step Forward, One Step Back: A Contribution to the Ongoing Conceptual Debate in Youth Studies. Journal of Youth Studies. Vol. 15. No. 3. P. 389—401.

Silva J. M., Corse S. M. (2018) Envisioning and Enacting Class Mobility: The Routine Constructions of the Agentic Self. American Journal of Cultural Sociology. Vol. 6. No. 2. P. 231—265. https://doi.org/10.1057/s41290-017-0026-x.

Spencer G., Doull M. (2015) Examining Concepts of Power and Agency in Research with Young People. Journal of Youth Studies. Vol. 18. No. 7. P. 900—913. https://doi.org/10.1080/13676261.2014.1001827.

Suckert L. (2022) Back to the Future: Sociological Perspectives on Expectations, Aspirations and Imagined Futures. European Journal of Sociology / Archives Européennes de Sociologie. Vol. 63. No. 3. P. 393—428.

Tavory I., Eliasoph N. (2013) Coordinating Futures: Toward a Theory of Anticipation. American Journal of Sociology. Vol. 118. No. 4. P. 908—942. https://doi.org/10.1086/668646.

Threadgold S., Nilan P. (2009) Reflexivity of Contemporary Youth, Risk and Cultural Capital. Current Sociology. Vol. 57. No. 1. P. 47—68. https://doi.org/10.1177/0011392108097452.

Vakalopoulos K. (2023) Shedding Some (More) Light in Bourdieu's Habitus and Doxa: A Socio-Phenomenological Approach. Journal for the Theory of Social Behaviour. Vol. 53. No. 2. P. 255–270. https://doi.org/10.1111/jtsb.12364.

Woodman D. (2009) The Mysterious Case of the Pervasive Choice Biography: Ulrich Beck, Structure/Agency, and the Middling State of Theory in the Sociology of Youth. Journal of Youth Studies. Vol. 12. No. 3. P. 243—256. https://doi.org/10.1080/13676260902807227.

Zilberstein S., Ayala-Hurtado E., Sanchez M., Robey D. (2024) The Self in Action: Narrating Agentic Moments. RSF: The Russell Sage Foundation Journal of the Social Sciences. Vol. 10. No. 5. P. 118—140. https://doi.org/10.7758/RSF.2024.10.5.05.

Published

2026-11-10

How to Cite

Tolstykh, D. S. (2026). Horizons of the Possible: Agency and Reflexivity in Narratives about the Future among College Students in Norilsk. Monitoring of Public Opinion: Economic and Social Changes, (5), 119–143. https://doi.org/10.14515/monitoring.2026.5.3345