Interaction of Users of Different Ages with a Service Robot: A Laboratory Study

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.14515/monitoring.2024.5.2626

Keywords:

human-robot interaction (HRI), service robot, social robot, social attitudes towards new technologies, communication agents, adaptation to interaction with a robot, attitude towards robots, user study

Abstract

The article is devoted to studying human-robot interaction (HRI) using the example of user interaction with a service social robot. The study has a multi-paradigm basis in theoretical and methodological terms: the subjective users’ experience and their adaptation to a particular interaction situation with the robot are considered within social constructivism, phenomenology, and ethnomethodology. The empirical basis is laboratory research using social experiments, observation, and focus groups. The experiment participants interacted with different types of agents (a human and a service robot in different modes of operation), simulating receiving a standard state service for the execution of documents.

According to the study results, the features of the actual interaction with the service robot, as well as the subjective perception of this experience by users of different age groups, are highlighted. The study confirms the hypothesis that young users adapt more quickly to interaction with a robot, which is expressed in the speed of interaction and subjective satisfaction with this interaction. According to the estimates of the middle-aged and older study participants, it is easier for them to receive services interacting with a human consultant and, according to the estimates of young participants, with a robot (regardless of its mode of operation). Differences in expectations and assessments regarding robots at the level of general social attitudes are also highlighted. According to the results of the focus groups, the willingness to interact with robots is reduced due to distrust of the functional capabilities of the robot, lack of confidence in their competence, and fear of uncertainty (a wary attitude towards everything new).

 

Acknowledgements. The authors extend their sincere gratitude to Olga Alexandrovna Ganina and Yuri Mikhailovich Wasserman, esteemed members of the Department of Sociology and Political Science at PNRPU, for their invaluable assistance in conducting this study. We also express our appreciation to Promobot LLC (Perm) for their support and collaboration, which was instrumental in the successful execution of this research.

Author Biographies

Olga A. Burova, Perm National Research Polytechnic University

  • Perm National Research Polytechnic University, Perm, Russia
    • Senior Lecturer at the Department of Sociology and Political Science

Yulia S. Neverova, Perm National Research Polytechnic University

  • Perm National Research Polytechnic University, Perm, Russia
    • Senior Lecturer at the Department of Sociology and Political Science

Guzel I. Seletkova, Perm National Research Polytechnic University

  • Perm National Research Polytechnic University, Perm, Russia
    • Senior Lecturer at the Department of Sociology and Political Science

Elena V. Serdkina, Perm National Research Polytechnic University

  • Perm National Research Polytechnic University, Perm, Russia
    • Cand. Sci. (Philos.), Associate Professor, Director of the Research Center “Center for Technology Assessment”

References

Абрамов Р. Н., Катечкина В. М. Социальные аспекты взаимодействия человека и робота: опыт экспериментального исследования // Журнал социологии и социальной антропологии. 2022. Т. 25. № 2. С. 214—243.

Abramov R. N., Katechkina V. M. (2022) Social Aspects of Human-Robot Interaction: Experimental Research Experience. The Journal of Sociology and Social Anthropology. Vol. 25. No. 2. P. 214—243. (In Russ.)

Бергер П., Лукман Т. Социальное конструировании реальности. Трактат по социологии знания. М.: Медиум, 1995.

Berger P., Lukman T. (1995) The Social Construction of Reality. A Treatise in the Sociology of Knowledge. Moscow: Medium. (In Russ.)

Гаврилина Е. А. Агентность не-человеков: взаимодействие людей и социальных роботов // Мониторинг общественного мнения: экономические и социальные перемены. 2023. № 3. С. 41—55. https://doi.org/10.14515/monitoring.2023.3.2318.

Gavrilina E. A. (2023) Agency of Non-humans: Interaction of Humans and Autonomous Intelligent Systems. Monitoring of Pablic Opinion: Economic and Social Changes. No. 3. P. 41—55. https://doi.org/10.14515/monitoring.2023.3.2318. (In Russ.)

Зильберман Н. Н., Стефанцова М. А. Социальный робот: подходы к определению понятия // Современные исследования социальных проблем (электронный научный журнал). 2016. № 11. С. 297—312. https://doi.org/10.12731/2218-7405-2016-11-297-312.

Zilberman N. N., Stefantsova M. A. (2016) Social Robot: Defining the Concept. Modern Research of Social Problem. No. 11. P. 297—312. https://doi.org/10.12731/2218-7405-2016-11-297-312. (In Russ.)

Сачмен Л. Реконфигурации отношений человек — машина: планы и ситуативные действия / пер. с англ. А. С. Максимовой; под ред. А.М. Корбута. М.: Элементарные формы, 2019.

Suchman L. (2019) Plans and Situated Actions: The Problem of Human — Machine Communication. Moscow: Elementary forms. (In Russ.)

Broekens J., Heerink M., Rosendal H. (2009) Assistive Social Robots in Elderly Care: A Review. Gerontechnology. Vol. 8. № 2. P. 94—103.

Gnambs T., Appel M. (2019) Are Robots Becoming Unpopular? Changes in Attitudes Towards Autonomous Robotic Systems in Europe. Computers in Human Behavior. No. 93. P. 53-61. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2018.11.045.

Hegel F., Muhl C., Wrede B., Hielscher-Fastabend M., Sagerer G. (2009) Understanding Social Robots. In: Second International Conference on Advances in Computer-Human Interaction. Cancun: IEEE. P. 169—174. https://doi.org/10.1109/ACHI.2009.51.

Hudson J., Orviska M., Hunady J. (2017) People’s Attitudes to Robots in Caring for the Elderly. International Journal of Social Robotics. No. 9. P. 199—210. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12369-016-0384-5.

Katz J. E., Halpern D., Crocker E. T. (2015) In the Company of Robots: Views of Acceptability of Robots in Social Settings. In: Vincent J., Taipale S., Sapio B., Lugano G., Fortunati L. (eds.) Social Robots from a Human Perspective. Cham: Springer. P. 24—38. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-15672-9_3.

Mandl S., Bretschneider M., Asbrock F., Meyer B., Strobel A. (2022) The Social Perception of Robots Scale (SPRS): Developing and Testing a Scale for Successful Interaction Between Humans and Robots. In: Camarinha-Matos L. M., Ortiz A., Boucher X., Osório A. L. (eds.) Collaborative Networks in Digitalization and Society 5.0. PRO-VE. IFIP Advances in Information and Communication Technology. Vol. 662. Cham: Springer. P. 321—334. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-14844-6_26.

Naneva S., Sarda M., Webb T.L., Prescott T.J. (2020) A Systematic Review of Attitudes, Anxiety, Acceptance and Trust Towards Social Robots. International Journal of Social Robotics. No. 12. P. 1179—1201. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12369-020-00659-4.

Published

2024-11-08

How to Cite

Burova, O. A., Neverova, Y. S., Seletkova, G. I., & Seredkina, E. V. (2024). Interaction of Users of Different Ages with a Service Robot: A Laboratory Study. Monitoring of Public Opinion: Economic and Social Changes, (5). https://doi.org/10.14515/monitoring.2024.5.2626