Trust in Manipulative Information: From Perception to Decision Making
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.14515/monitoring.2024.3.2544Keywords:
manipulative information, disinformation, mediaframing, fake news, deepfake, trust, decision makingAbstract
Decision making is strongly influenced by available information.The growing volume and new technologies for creating manipulative information cause high risks of disorientation in the media space. The article demonstrates key interdisciplinary approaches to the study of several important categories of manipulative information and the technological evolution from common media manipulations (using the example of media framing through euphemisms) to modern types of false information (fake news and deepfakes). The authors consider the role of trust in manipulative information in the context of (a) the source, (b) content, and (c) consumer of information. An entire body of interdisciplinary research demonstrates that the credibility of fake content and its influence on decision-making is significantly dependent on the factors belonging to these categories. This theoretical review not only combines the results of key studies in psychology, sociology, and economics, but also significantly expands the understanding of the manipulative information impact features in the context of the rapid development of new technologies.
Acknowledgments. The work was carried out within the framework of HSE Basic Research Program.
References
Джавадова С. А. Медиафрейминг как инструмент влияния на общественное мнение // E-SCIO. 2020. Т. 5. № 44. С. 85―93.
Javadova S. A. (2020). Media Framing as a Tool for Influencing Public Opinion. E-Scio. Vol. 5. No. 44. P. 85―93. (In Russ.)
Зуйкина К. Л., Соколова Д. В. Специфика контента российских фейковых новостей в Интернете и на телевидении // Вестник Московского университета. Серия 10: Журналистика. 2019. № 4. С. 3―22. https://doi.org/10.30547/vestnik.journ.4.2019.322.
Zuykina K. L., Sokolova D. V. (2019) Content Specifics of Russian Fake News on the Internet and on Television. Vestnik Moskovskogo Universiteta. Seriya. 10. Zhurnalistika. No. 4. P. 3―22. https://doi.org/10.30547/vestnik.journ.4.2019.322. (In Russ.)
Климова А. М., Чмель К. Ш., Савин Н. Ю. Верю-не-верю: общественное мнение и слухи о происхождении нового коронавируса // Мониторинг общественного мнения: экономические и социальные перемены. 2020. № 6. С. 266―283. https://doi.org/10.14515/monitoring.2020.6.1752.
Klimova A. M., Chmel K. S., Savin N. Y. (2020) Believe It or Not: Public Opinion and Rumors About COVID-19. Monitoring of Public Opinion: Economic and Social Changes. Vol. 6. P. 266―283. https://doi.org/10.14515/monitoring.2020.6.1752. (In Russ.)
Лопатин С. В. Политический фрейминг как стратегия манипулирования политическим сознанием // Дискурс-Пи. 2019. Т. 16. No. 1. С. 68―76.
Lopatin S. V. (2019) Political Framing as a Strategy for Manipulating Political Consciousness. Discourse-Pi. Vol. 16. No. 1. P. 68―76. (In Russ.)
Муценек В. Е. Дезинформация как инцидент информационной безопасности // Известия Иркутского государственного университета. Серия: Политология. Религиоведение. 2018. Т. 24. С. 24―32.
Mutsenek V. E. (2018) Disinformation as an Information Security Incident. The Bulletin of Irkutsk State University. Series «Political Science and Religion Studies». Vol. 24. P. 24―32. (In Russ.)
Родина О. Н., Прудков П. Н. Апробация русскоязычных версий теста когнитивной рефлексии // Вопросы психологии. 2019. №. 4. С. 155―162.
Rodina O. N., Prudkov P. N. (2019) Testing of a Russian-Language Version of a Cognitive Reflection. Voprosy Psychologii. No. 4. P. 155―162. (In Russ.)
Ahmed S. (2023) Navigating the Maze: Deepfakes, Cognitive Ability, and Social Media News Skepticism. New Media & Society. Vol. 25. No. 5. P. 1108―1129. https://doi.org/10.1177/14614448211019198.
Allen J., Howland B., Mobius M., Rothschild D., Watts D. J. (2020) Evaluating the Fake News Problem at the Scale of the Information Ecosystem. Science Advances. Vol. 6. No. 14. Art. eaay3539. https://doi.org/10.1126/sciadv.aay3539.
Bauer P. C., Clemm von Hohenberg B. (2020) Believing and Sharing Information by Fake Sources: An Experiment. Political Communication. Vol. 38. No. 6. P. 647―671. https://doi.org/10.1080/10584609.2020.1840462.
Bechara A., Damasio A. R. (2005) The Somatic Marker Hypothesis: A Neural Theory of Economic Decision. Games and Economic Behavior. Vol. 52. No. 2. P. 336―372. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geb.2004.06.010.
Bronstein M. V., Pennycook G., Bear A., Rand D. G., Cannon T. D. (2019) Belief in Fake News is Associated with Delusionality, Dogmatism, Religious Fundamentalism, and Reduced Analytic Thinking. Journal of Applied Research in Memory and Cognition. Vol. 8. No. 1. P. 108―117. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jarmac.2018.09.005.
Bruner J. (1991) The Narrative Construction of Reality. Critical Inquiry. Vol. 18. No. 1. P. 1―21. https://doi.org/10.1086/448619.
Bryanov K., Kliegl R., Koltsova O., Miltsov A., Pashakhin S., Porshnev A., Sinyavskaya Y., Terpilovskii M., Vziatysheva V. (2023) What Drives Perceptions of Foreign News Coverage Credibility? A Cross-National Experiment Including Kazakhstan, Russia, and Ukraine. Political Communication. Vol. 40. No. 2. P. 115―146. https://doi.org/10.1080/10584609.2023.2172492.
Bryanov K., Vziatysheva V. (2021) Determinants of Individuals’ Belief in Fake News: A Scoping Review Determinants of Belief in Fake News. PLOS ONE. Vol. 16. No. 6. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0253717.
Burkhardt J. M. (2017) Combating Fake News in the Digital Age. Library Technology Reports. Vol. 53. No. 8. Chicago, IL: American Library Association. URL: https://www.journals.ala.org/index.php/ltr/issue%20/viewFile%20/662/423 (дата обращения: 08.04.2024).
Cacioppo J. T., Petty R. E., Feng Kao C. (1984) The Efficient Assessment of Need for Cognition. Journal of Personality Assessment. Vol. 48. No. 3. P. 306―307. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327752jpa4803_13.
Chaiken S., Maheswaran D. (1994) Heuristic Processing Can Bias Systematic Processing: Effects of Source Credibility, Argument Ambiguity, and Task Importance on Attitude Judgment. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology. Vol. 66. No. 3. 460–473. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.66.3.460.
Chesney B., Citron D. (2019) Deep Fakes: A Looming Challenge for Privacy. California Law Review. Vol. 107. No. 6. P. 1753―1820. https://doi.org/10.15779/Z38RV0D15J.
Cialdini R. B., Goldstein N. J. (2004) Social Influence: Compliance and Conformity. Annual Review of Psychology. Vol. 55. P. 591―621. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.psych.55.090902.142015.
Cohen A. R., Scotland E., Wolfe D. M. (1955) An Experimental Investigation of Need for Cognition. The Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology. Vol. 51. No. 2. P. 291―294. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0042761.
Colliander J. (2019) “This is Fake News”: Investigating the Role of Conformity to Other Users’ Views When Commenting on and Spreading Disinformation in Social Media. Computers in Human Behavior. Vol. 97. P. 202―215. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2019.03.032.
Cornelissen J. P., Werner M. D. (2014) Putting Framing in Perspective: A Review of Framing and Frame Analysis Across the Management and Organizational Literature. Academy of Management Annals. Vol. 8. No. 1. P. 181―235. https://doi.org/10.5465/19416520.2014.875669.
Druckman J. N., Bolsen T. (2011) Framing, Motivated Reasoning, and Opinions About Emergent Technologies. Journal of Communication. Vol. 61. No. 4. P. 659―688. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1460-2466.2011.01562.x.
Entman R. M. (1993) Framing: Toward Clarification of a Fractured Paradigm. Journal of Communication. Vol. 43. No. 4. P. 51―58. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1460-2466.1993.tb01304.x.
Ericsson K. A., Charness N. (1994) Expert Performance: Its Structure and Acquisition. American Psychologist. Vol. 49. No. 8. P. 725―747. https://doi.org/10.1037/0003-066X.49.8.725.
Evans J. S. B., Stanovich K. E. (2013) Dual-Process Theories of Higher Cognition: Advancing the Debate. Perspectives on Psychological Science. Vol. 8. No. 3. P. 223―241. https://doi.org/10.1177/1745691612460685.
Falk E., Scholz C. (2018) Persuasion, Influence, and Value: Perspectives from Communication and Social Neuroscience. Annual Review of Psychology. Vol. 69. P. 329―356. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-psych-122216-011821.
Farrow K., Grolleau G., Mzoughi N. (2021) ‘Let’s Call a Spade a Spade, Not a Gardening Tool’: How Euphemisms Shape Moral Judgement in Corporate Social Responsibility Domains. Journal of Business Research. Vol. 131. P. 254―267. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2021.04.002.
Fernandez M., Alani H. (2018) Online Misinformation: Challenges and Future Directions. In: WWW’18: Companion Proceedings of The Web Conference 2018. Geneva: International World Wide Web Conference Steering Committee. P. 595―602. https://doi.org/10.1145/3184558.3188730.
Fetzer J. H. (2004) Information: Does it Have to Be True? Minds and Machines. Vol. 14. P. 223―229. https://doi.org/10.1023/B:MIND.0000021682.61365.56.
Fisher W. R. (1984) Narration As a Human Communication Paradigm: The Case of Public Moral Argument. Communications Monographs. Vol. 51. No. 1. P. 1―22. https://doi.org/10.1080/03637758409390180.
Folkes V. S. (1988) Recent Attribution Research in Consumer Behavior: A Review and New Directions. Journal of Consumer Research. Vol. 14. No. 4. P. 548―565. https://doi.org/10.1086/209135.
Frederick S. (2005) Cognitive Reflection and Decision Making. Journal of Economic Perspectives. Vol. 19. No. 4. P. 25―42. https://doi.org/10.1257/089533005775196732.
Figueiras M. J., Ghorayeb J., Coutinho M. V., Marôco J., Thomas J. (2021) Levels of Trust in Information Sources as a Predictor of Protective Health Behaviors During COVID-19 Pandemic: A UAE Cross-Sectional Study. Frontiers in Psychology. Vol. 12. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2021.633550.
Gelfert A. (2018) Fake News: A Definition. Informal Logic. Vol. 38. No. 1. P. 84―117. https://doi.org/10.22329/il.v38i1.5068.
Giansiracusa N. (2021) Deepfake Deception: What to Trust When Seeing Is No Longer Believing. In: Giansiracusa N. How Algorithms Create and Prevent Fake News: Exploring the Impacts of Social Media, Deepfakes, GPT-3, and More. Berkeley, CA: Apress. P. 41―66. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4842-7155-1.
Gilbert T. (2011) Information Aggregation around Macroeconomic Announcements: Revisions Matter. Journal of Financial Economics. Vol. 101. No. 1. P. 114―131. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jfineco.2011.02.013.
Gladney G. A., Rittenburg T. L. (2005) Euphemistic Text Affects Attitudes, Behavior. Newspaper Research Journal. Vol. 26. No. 1. P. 28―41. https://doi.org/10.1177/073953290502600104.
Grinberg N., Joseph K., Friedland L., Swire-Thompson B., Lazer D. (2019) Fake News on Twitter during the 2016 U.S. Presidential Election. Science. Vol. 363. No. 6425. P. 374―378. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.aau2706.
Guo B., Ding Y., Sun Y., Ma S., Li K., Yu Z. (2021) The Mass, Fake News, and Cognition Security. Frontiers of Computer Science. Vol. 15. Art. 153806. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11704-020-9256-0.
Haidt J., Baron J. (1996) Social Roles and the Moral Judgement of Acts and Omissions. European Journal of Social Psychology. Vol. 26. No. 2. P. 201―218. https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1099-0992(199603)26:2<201::AID-EJSP745>3.0.CO;2-J.
Heesacker M., Petty R. E., Cacioppo J. T. (1983) Field Dependence and Attitude Change: Source Credibility Can Alter Persuasion by Affecting Message‐Relevant Thinking. Journal of Personality. Vol. 51. No. 4. P. 653―666. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-6494.1983.tb00872.x.
Herman E. S., Chomsky N. (1988) Manufacturing Consent: The Political Economy of the Mass Media. London: The Bodley Head. URL: http://www.lib.ysu.am/disciplines_bk/0b336d5592d19eef6f12f6aa52a93a8c.pdf.
Hochschild J. L., Einstein K. L. (2015) Do Facts Matter? Information and Misinformation in American Politics. Political Science Quarterly. Vol. 130. No. 4. P. 585―624. http://www.jstor.org/stable/43828727.
Hovland C. I., Weiss W. (1951) The Influence of Source Credibility on Communication Effectiveness. Public Opinion Quarterly. Vol. 15. No. 4. P. 635―650. https://doi.org/10.1086/266350.
Huynh T. L. D. (2020) Does Culture Matter Social Distancing under the COVID-19 Pandemic? Safety Science. Vol. 130. Art. 104872. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssci.2020.104872.
Jääskeläinen I. P., Sams M., Glerean E., Ahveninen J. (2021) Movies and Narratives as Naturalistic Stimuli in Neuroimaging. NeuroImage. Vol. 224. Art. 117445. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuroimage.2020.117445.
Kahneman D. (2003) Maps of Bounded Rationality: Psychology for Behavioral Economics. The American Economic Review. Vol. 93. No. 5. P. 1449―1475. https://www.jstor.org/stable/3132137.
Kany C. E. (1960) American-Spanish Euphemisms. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press. https://doi.org/10.1525/9780520403215.
Karnouskos S. (2020). Artificial Intelligence in Digital Media: The Era of Deepfakes. IEEE Transactions on Technology and Society. Vol. 1. No. 3. P. 138―147. https://doi.org/10.1109/TTS.2020.3001312.
Kietzmann J., Lee L. W., McCarthy I. P., Kietzmann T. C. (2020) Deepfakes: Trick or Treat? Business Horizons. Vol. 63. No. 2. P. 135―146. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bushor.2019.11.006.
Klucharev V., Shestakova A. (2015) Social Influence and Persuasion and Message Propagation. Brain Mapping: An Encyclopedic Reference. No. 3. P. 251―258. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-397025-1.00189-5.
Korshunov P., Marcel S. (2018) DeepFakes: A New Threat to Face Recognition? Assessment and Detection. arXiv. Art. 1812.08685. URL: https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.1812.08685. (дата обращения: 09.06.2024).
Lachlan K., Spence P. R. (2010) Communicating Risks: Examining Hazard and Outrage in Multiple Contexts. Risk Analysis: An International Journal. Vol. 30. No. 12. P. 1872―1886. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1539-6924.2010.01511.x.
Lazer D. M., Baum M. A., Benkler Y. et al. (2018) The Science of Fake News. Science. Vol. 359. No. 6380. P. 1094―1096. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.aao2998.
Levy N. (2023) What Does the CRT Measure? Poor Performance May Arise from Rational Processes. Philosophical Psychology. Vol. 36. No. 1. P. 58―84. https://doi.org/10.1080/09515089.2022.2038123.
Loewenstein G. F., Weber E. U., Hsee C. K., Welch N. (2001) Risk as Feelings. Psychological Bulletin. Vol. 127. No. 2. P. 267―286. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.127.2.267.
Loftus E. F., Palmer J. C. (1974) Reconstruction of Automobile Destruction: An Example of the Interaction between Language and Memory. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior. Vol. 13. No. 5. P. 585―589. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-5371(74)80011-3.
Machill M., Köhler S., Waldhauser M. (2007) The Use of Narrative Structures in Television News: An Experiment in Innovative Forms of Journalistic Presentation. European Journal of Communication. Vol. 22. No. 2. P. 185―205. https://doi.org/10.1177/0267323107076769.
Mills J., Aronson E. (1965) Opinion Change as a Function of the Communicator’s Attractiveness and Desire to Influence. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology. Vol. 1. No. 2. P. 173―177. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0021646.
Molina M. D., Sundar S. S., Le T., Lee D. (2021) “Fake News” Is Not Simply False Information: A Concept Explication and Taxonomy of Online Content. American Behavioral Scientist. Vol. 65. No. 2. P. 180―212. https://doi.org/10.1177/0002764219878224.
Moravec P., Minas R., Dennis A. R. (2018) Fake News on Social Media: People Believe What They Want to Believe When It Makes No Sense at All. Kelley School of Business Research Paper No. 18―87. Bloomington, IN: Indiana University. http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3269541.
Pennycook G., McPhetres J., Zhang Y., Lu J. G., Rand D. G. (2020) Fighting COVID-19 Misinformation on Social Media: Experimental Evidence for a Scalable Accuracy-Nudge Intervention. Psychological Science. Vol. 31. No. 7. P. 770―780. https://doi.org/10.1177/0956797620939054.
Pennycook G., Cheyne J. A., Koehler D. J., Fugelsang J. A. (2016) Is the Cognitive Reflection Test a Measure of Both Reflection and Intuition? Behavior Research Methods. Vol. 48. P. 341―348. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13428-015-0576-1.
Pennycook G., Fugelsang J. A., Koehler D. J. (2015) What Makes Us Think? A Three-Stage Dual-Process Model of Analytic Engagement. Cognitive Psychology. Vol. 80. P. 34―72. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cogpsych.2015.05.001.
Pennycook G., Rand D. G. (2019) Lazy, Not Biased: Susceptibility to Partisan Fake News Is Better Explained by Lack of Reasoning than by Motivated Reasoning. Cognition. Vol. 188. P. 39―50. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cognition.2018.06.011.
Petty R. E., Cacioppo J. T., Goldman R. (1981) Personal Involvement as a Determinant of Argument-Based Persuasion. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology. Vol. 41. No. 5. P. 847―855. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.41.5.847.
Petty R. E., Cacioppo J. T. (1986) The Elaborative Likelihood Model of Persuasion. Advances in Experimental Social Psychology. Vol. 19. P. 123―205. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0065-2601(08)60214-2.
Piotrowski S., Grimmelikhuijsen S., Deat F. (2019) Numbers over Narratives? How Government Message Strategies Affect Citizens’ Attitudes. Public Performance & Management Review. Vol. 42. No. 5. P. 1005―1028. https://doi.org/10.1080/15309576.2017.1400992.
Plous S. (1993) The Psychology of Judgment and Decision Making. New York, NY: Mcgraw-Hill.
Priester J. R., Petty R. E. (2003) The Influence of Spokesperson Trustworthiness on Message Elaboration, Attitude Strength, and Advertising Effectiveness. Journal of Consumer Psychology. Vol. 13. No. 4. P. 408―421. https://doi.org/10.1207/S15327663JCP1304_08.
Rhine R. J., Severance L. J. (1970) Ego-Involvement, Discrepancy, Source Credibility, and Attitude Change. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology. Vol. 16. No. 2. P. 175―190. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0029832.
Rossler A., Cozzolino D., Verdoliva L., Riess C., Thies J., Nießner M. (2019) Faceforensics++: Learning to Detect Manipulated Facial Images. arXiv. Art. 1901.08971. https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.1901.08971.
Schnall S., Haidt J., Clore G. L., Jordan A. H. (2008) Disgust as Embodied Moral Judgment. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin. Vol. 34. No. 8. P. 1096―1109. https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167208317771.
Seate A. A., Harwood J., Blecha E. (2010) “He Was Framed!” Framing Criminal Behavior in Sports News. Communication Research Reports. Vol. 27. No. 4. P. 343―354. https://doi.org/10.1080/08824096.2010.518917.
Shu K., Sliva A., Wang S., Tang J., Liu H. (2017) Fake News Detection on Social Media: A Data Mining Perspective. ACM SIGKDD Explorations Newsletter. Vol. 19. No. 1. P. 22―36. https://doi.org/10.1145/3137597.3137600.
Sindermann C., Cooper A., Montag C. (2020) A Short Review on Susceptibility to Falling for Fake Political News. Current Opinion in Psychology. Vol. 36. P. 44―48. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.copsyc.2020.03.014.
Stanovich K. E. (2009). Distinguishing the Reflective, Algorithmic, and Autonomous Minds: Is It Time for a Tri-Process Theory. In: Evans J. S. B., Frankish R. (eds.) Two Minds: Dual Processes and Beyond. Oxford: Oxford University Press. P. 55―88.
Sundar S. S. (2008). The MAIN Model: A Heuristic Approach to Understanding Technology Effects on Credibility. In: Metzger M. J., Flanagin A. J. (eds.) Digital Media, Youth, and Credibility. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press. P. 73―100.
Thaler R., Sunstein C. (2008) Nudge: Improving Decisions about Health, Wealth and Happiness. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
Thiruchselvam R., Gopi Y., Kilekwang L., Harper J., Gross J. J. (2017) In God We Trust? Neural Measures Reveal Lower Social Conformity among Non-Religious Individuals. Social Cognitive and Affective Neuroscience. Vol. 12. No. 6. P. 956―964. https://doi.org/10.1093/scan/nsx023.
Tsfati Y., Ariely G. (2014) Individual and Contextual Correlates of Trust in Media Across 44 Countries. Communication Research. Vol. 41. No. 6. P. 760―782. https://doi.org/10.1177/0093650213485972.
Tversky A., Kahneman D. (1981). The Framing of Decisions and the Psychology of Choice. Science. Vol. 211. No. 4481. P. 453―458.
Vaccari C., Chadwick A. (2020). Deepfakes and Disinformation: Exploring the Impact of Synthetic Political Video on Deception, Uncertainty, and Trust in News. Social Media+ Society. Vol. 6. No. 1. https://doi.org/10.1177/2056305120903408.
Valkenburg P. M., Peter J., Walther J. B. (2016) Media Effects: Theory and Research. Annual Review of Psychology. Vol. 67. P. 315―338. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-psych-122414-033608.
Von Neumann J., Morgenstern O. (2004). Theory of Games and Economic Behavior. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press. https://doi.org/10.1515/9781400829460.
Wasserman H., Madrid-Morales D. (2019) An Exploratory Study of “Fake News” and Media Trust in Kenya, Nigeria and South Africa. African Journalism Studies. Vol. 40. No. 1. P. 107―123. https://doi.org/10.1080/23743670.2019.1627230.
Westney Z. V., Hur I., Wang L., Sun J. (2023) Examining the Effects of Disinformation and Trust on Social Media Users’ COVID-19 Vaccine Decision-Making. Information Technology & People. Vol. 37 No. 3. P. 1334―1359. https://doi.org/10.1108/ITP-05-2022-0410.
Wijenayake S., van Berkel N., Kostakos V., Goncalves J. (2020) Impact of Contextual and Personal Determinants on Online Social Conformity. Computers in Human Behavior. Vol. 108. Art. 106302. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2020.106302.
Zajonc R. B. (1980) Feeling and Thinking: Preferences Need No Inferences. American Psychologist. Vol. 35. No. 2. P. 151―175. https://doi.org/10.1037/0003-066X.35.2.151.
Zhou X., Zafarani R., Shu K., Liu H. (2019) Fake News: Fundamental Theories, Detection Strategies and Challenges. In: WSDM’19 Proceedings of the Twelfth ACM International Conference on Web Search and Data Mining. New York, NY: Association for Computing Machinery. P. 836―837. https://doi.org/10.1145/3289600.3291382.
Zillmann D., Chen L., Knobloch S., Callison C. (2004) Effects of Lead Framing on Selective Exposure to Internet News Reports. Communication Research. Vol. 31. No. 1. P. 58―81. https://doi.org/10.1177/0093650203260201.
Zuckerman A., Chaiken S. (1998) A Heuristic‐Systematic Processing Analysis of the Effectiveness of Product Warning Labels. Psychology & Marketing. Vol. 15. No. 7. P. 621―642. https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1520-6793(199810)15:7<621::AID-MAR2>3.0.CO;2-H.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2024 Monitoring of Public Opinion: Economic and Social Changes
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
