Inequality in Spending on Medicines and Dietary Supplements in Russia: An Empirical Analysis
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.14515/monitoring.2023.6.2473Keywords:
medicines, dietary supplements, health, income, inequality, COVID-19 pandemicAbstract
The article examines access to medicines and dietary supplements in Russian families with different income levels in 2010―2021. Using regression analysis, the authors study both factors of refusal to purchase medicines and dietary supplements and the amount of expenses for them, justifying the need to estimate these indicators by quintile income groups. The empirical analysis is based on the RLMS-HSE data and employs Heckman models, binary choice models, and random effect models for panel data. Along with per capita household income, the authors include other relevant factors that can impact family expenditures on medicines and dietary supplements, namely: health status (multimorbidity, self-assessment of health, doctor visits), education, household composition (the presence of children and pensioners), and place of residence. The study reveals a significant difference in the per capita expenditures on medicines and dietary supplements in different income quintiles: in 2021 this difference reached 2.8 times between the fifth and the first quintiles. Families from the lowest income quintile may refuse to purchase medicines and dietary supplements due to low income, which is not typical for other income quintiles. Health factors are significant for all income quintiles, but their impact increases in higher income quintiles. On the contrary, for the lowest income quintile, income is more important than health factors. Families from the lowest income quintile experienced significant cuts in real spending on medicines and dietary supplements in 2020―2021, despite the increased need for treatment due to the COVID-19 pandemic. In conclusion, among other things, the authors highlight a necessity to develop additional mechanisms for drug provision to respond to unforeseen deterioration in the financial situation of families during periods of crisis.
Acknowledgments. The paper was prepared within the Research Working Group on the Evaluation of Social Policy Programs’ and Measures’ Effectiveness funded by the Faculty of Economic Sciences, HSE University.
References
Засимова Л.С., Коссова Е.В. Расходы населения России на лекарственные средства: эмпирический анализ // Прикладная эконометрика. 2016. Т. 42. № 2. С. 75—99. URL: https://ideas.repec.org/a/ris/apltrx/0292.html (дата обращения: 20.12.2023).
Zasimova L.S., Kossova E.V. (2016) Expenditures of the Russian Population on Medicines: An Empirical Analysis. Applied Econometrics. Vol. 42. No. 2. P. 75—99. URL: https://ideas.repec.org/a/ris/apltrx/0292.html (accessed: 20.12.2023). (In Russ.)
Засимова Л.С., Хусаинова А.Г. Медицинские и экономические факторы расходов населения на лекарственные средства и биологически активные добавки во время пандемии COVID-19 // Социальные аспекты здоровья населения. 2022. № 6. https://doi.org/10.21045/2071-5021-2022-68-6-3.
Zasimova L.S., Khusainova A.G. (2022) Medical and Economic Factors of Household Spending on Medicines and Dietary Supplements during the COVID-19 Pandemic. Social Aspects of Public Health. No. 6. https://doi.org/10.21045/2071-5021-2022-68-6-3. (In Russ.)
Карцева М.А., Кузнецова П.О. Здоровье, доходы, возраст: эмпирический анализ неравенства в здоровье населения России // Мониторинг общественного мнения: экономические и социальные перемены. 2023. № 2. С. 160—185. https://doi.org/10.14515/monitoring.2023.2.2355.
Kartseva M.A., Kuznetsova P.O. (2023) Health, Income, Age: Empirical Analysis of Health Inequality in Russia. Monitoring of Public Opinion: Economic and Social Changes. No. 2. P. 160—185. https://doi.org/10.14515/monitoring.2023.2.2355. (In Russ.)
Ahn S., Kim S., Koh K. (2022) Associations of the COVID-19 Pandemic with Older Individuals’ Healthcare Utilization and Self-Reported Health Status: A Longitudinal Analysis from Singapore. BMC Health Services Research. Vol. 22. Art. 66. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12913-021-07446-5.
Blam I., Kovalev S. (2003) Commercialization of Medical Care and Household Behavior in Transitional Russia. Geneva: United Nations Research Institute for Social Development.
Brinda E.M., Rajkumar A.P., Enemark U., Prince M., Jacob K.S. (2012) Nature and Determinants of Out-of-Pocket Health Expenditure among Older People in a Rural Indian Community. International Psychogeriatrics. Vol. 24. No. 10. P. 1664—1673. https://doi.org/10.1017/S104161021200083X.
Czeisler M.É., Marynak K., Clarke K.E.N., Salah Z., Shakya I., Thierry J.M., Ali N., McMillan H., Wiley J.F., Weaver M.D., Czeisler C.A., Rajaratnam S.M.W., Howard M.E. (2020) Delay or Avoidance of Medical Care Because of COVID-19-Related Concerns — United States, June 2020. Morbidity and Mortality Weekly Report. Vol. 69. No. 36. P. 1250—1257. https://doi.org/10.15585/mmwr.mm6936a4.
Gerdtham U.-G., Johannesson M. (1999) New Estimates of the Demand for Health: Results Based on a Categorical Health Measure and Swedish Micro Data. Social Science & Medicine. Vol. 49. No. 10. P. 1325—1332. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0277-9536(99)00206-3.
Gerry C.J., Kaneva M. (2021) Adapting to the Challenges of Chronic Non-Communicable Diseases: Evidence from Russia. Applied Research in Quality of Life. Vol. 16. No. 4. P. 1537—1553. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11482-020-09831-4.
Gerry C.J., Kaneva M., Zasimova L. (2017) Reforming Voluntary Drug Insurance in Russian Healthcare: Does Social Solidarity Matter? Health Policy. Vol. 121. No. 11. P. 1177—1185. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.healthpol.2017.09.001.
Grossman M. (1972) On the Concept of Health Capital and the Demand for Health. Journal of Political Economy. Vol. 80. No. 2. P. 223—255. https://doi.org/10.1086/259880.
Grossman M. (2000) The Human Capital Model. In: Culyer A. J., Newhouse J. P. (eds.) Handbook of Health Economics. Vol. 1. Part A. Amsterdam: Elsevier. P. 347—408. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1574-0064(00)80166-3.
Heckman J.J. (1976) The Common Structure of Statistical Models of Truncation, Sample Selection and Limited Dependent Variables and a Simple Estimator for Such Models. Annals of Economic and Social Measurement. Vol. 5. No. 4. P. 475—492.
Heckman J.J. (1979) Sample Selection Bias as a Specification Error. Econometrica. Vol. 47. No. 1. P. 153—161. https://doi.org/10.2307/1912352.
Jiang D.H., McCoy R.G. (2020) Planning for the Post-COVID Syndrome: How Payers Can Mitigate Long-Term Complications of the Pandemic. Journal of General Internal Medicine. Vol. 35. No. 10. P. 3036—3039. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11606-020-06042-3.
Kaneva M., Gerry C.J., Baidin V. (2018) The Effect of Chronic Conditions and Multi-Morbidity on Self-Assessed Health in Russia. Scandinavian Journal of Public Health. Vol. 46. No. 8. P. 886—896. https://doi.org/10.1177/1403494817746283.
Leibowitz A.A. (2004) The Demand for Health and Health Concerns after 30 Years. Journal of Health Economics. Vol. 23. No. 4. P. 663—671. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhealeco.2004.04.005.
Mueller C., Schur C., O’Connell J. (1997) Prescription Drug Spending: The Impact of Age and Chronic Disease Status. American Journal of Public Health. Vol. 87. No. 10. P. 1626—1629. https://doi.org/10.2105/ajph.87.10.1626.
Muschol J., Gissel C. (2021) COVID-19 Pandemic and Waiting Times in Outpatient Specialist Care in Germany: An Empirical Analysis. BMC Health Services Research. Vol. 21. No. 1. P. 1—10. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12913-021-07094-9.
Paez K.A., Zhao L., Hwang W. (2009) Rising Out-Of-Pocket Spending for Chronic Conditions: A Ten-Year Trend. Health Affairs. Vol. 28. No. 1. P. 15—25. https://doi.org/10.1377/hlthaff.28.1.15.
Ruger J.P., Kim H.-J. (2007) Out-of-Pocket Healthcare Spending by the Poor and Chronically Ill in the Republic of Korea. American Journal of Public Health. Vol. 97. No. 5. P. 804—811. https://doi.org/10.2105/AJPH.2005.080184.
Sanwald A., Theurl E. (2017) Out-of-Pocket Expenditures for Pharmaceuticals: Lessons from the Austrian Household Budget Survey. The European Journal of Health Economics. Vol. 18. No. 4. P. 435—447. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10198-016-0797-y.
Sari N., Langenbrunner J.C. (2001) Consumer Out-of-Pocket Spending for Pharmaceuticals in Kazakhstan: Implications for Sectoral Reform. Health Policy and Planning. Vol. 16. No. 4. P. 428—434. https://doi.org/10.1093/heapol/16.4.428.
Sum G., Hone T., Atun R., Millett C., Suhrcke M., Mahal A., Choon-Haut Koh G., Lee J. (2018) Multimorbidity and Out-of-Pocket Expenditure on Medicines: A Systematic Review. BMJ Global Health. Vol. 3. No. 1. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjgh-2017-000505.
Van Minh H., Kim Phuong N.T., Saksena P., James C.D., Xu K. (2013) Financial Burden of Household Out-of Pocket Health Expenditure in Viet Nam: Findings from the National Living Standard Survey 2002—2010. Social Science & Medicine. Vol. 96. P. 258—263. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.socscimed.2012.11.028.
WHO (2004) Equitable Access to Essential Medicines: A Framework for Collective Action. Geneva: World Health Organization.
You X., Kobayashi Ya. (2011) Determinants of Out-of-Pocket Health Expenditure in China: Analysis Using China Health and Nutrition Survey Data. Applied Health Economics and Health Policy. Vol. 9. No. 1. P. 39—49. https://doi.org/10.2165/11530730-000000000-00000.
Yue Y.R., Hong H.G. (2012) Bayesian Tobit Quantile Regression Model for Medical Expenditure Panel Survey Data. Statistical Modelling. Vol. 12. No. 4. P. 323—346. https://doi.org/10.1177/1471082X1201200402.
Zazdravnykh E.A., Aistov A.V., Aleksandrova E.A. (2021) Total Expenditure Elasticity of Healthcare Spending in Russia. Russian Journal of Economics. Vol. 7. No. 4. P. 326—353. https://doi.org/10.32609/j.ruje.7.76219.
Zhao J., Zhong H. (2015) Medical Expenditure in Urban China: A Quantile Regression Analysis. International Journal of Health Economics and Management. Vol. 15. No. 4. P. 387—406. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10754-015-9174-0.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2023 Monitoring of Public Opinion: Economic and Social Changes Journal (Public Opinion Monitoring) ISSN 2219-5467
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.