The Evolution of Electoral Technique in Russia: from Door-to-Door to Digitall Control and Back

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.14515/monitoring.2023.1.2340

Keywords:

elections, electorate, elite, power, political marketers, Russian region, electoral services market, electoral technique, digital technologies

Abstract

Based on interviews with Russian political consultants, and business and government representatives, the reconstruction process of electoral techniques in contemporary Russia is being held. Using empirical data, the authors explore the features of forming the market for electoral services in the context of the electoral process and the impact on the election campaigns that representatives of government, business, and political consultants have. The analysis of electoral techniques reconstructed by experts showed that they usually evolve along with the general political practices in the country. The electoral services market, established in the 90s, reflected the increased demand for a different kind of politics — not only from the Russian electorate but also from new politicians and business representatives. In the course of the empirical study, it was revealed that due to the evolution of the political regime in Russia, electoral techniques had undergone a significant transformation, and, in general, the electoral system is being reproduced on an enclosed basis. The past election campaigns have shown that the use of administrative resources often has unpredictable consequences. Therefore digital resources are now being actively used, dramatically technologizing the electoral process and increasing the accuracy of counting votes. Traditional methods of conducting an election campaign in combination with digital technologies are becoming a new way of communication and expanding opportunities for the participation of ordinary citizens in big politics and the development of digital democracy. The architects of digital products are not only professionals of the electoral market represented by political technologists, journalists, and representatives of political parties and social movements but also developers and users.

Author Biography

Natalya V. Kolesnik, Sociological Institute RAS — Branch of the FCTAS RAS

  • Sociological Institute of the RAS — Branch of the Federal Center of Theoretical and Applied Sociology of the Russian Academy of Sciences, Saint Petersburg, Russia
    • Cand. Sci. (Soc.), Senior Research Fellow

References

Барсукова С. Ю. Власть и бизнес: новые правила игры // Полис. Политические исследования. 2006. № 6. С. 135—144. https://doi.org/10.17976/jpps/2006.06.10.

Barsukova S. Yu. (2006) Power and Business: New Rules of the Game. Polis. Political Studies. No. 6. P. 135—144. https://doi.org/10.17976/jpps/2006.06.10. (In Russ.)

Барсукова С. Ю., Левин С. Н. Соотношение административного и финансового ресурсов в ходе избирательных кампаний в современной России: региональная специфика // Мониторинг общественного мнения: экономические и социальные перемены. 2020. № 4. С. 40—58.

Barsukova S. Y., Levin S.N. (2020) Ratio Between Administrative and Financial Resources during Election Campaigns in Modern Russia: Regional Specifics. Monitoring of Public Opinion: Economic and Social Changes. No. 4. P. 40—58. (In Russ.)

Бьюкенен Дж. Сочинения: в 1 т. T. I: Конституция экономической политики. Расчет согласия. Границы свободы / пер. с англ. Ю. Н. Парамонова, А. А. Соловьевой. М.: Таурус Альфа, 1997.

Buchanan J. (1997) Selected Works. Vol. I: The Constitution of Economic Policy. The Calculus of Consent. The Limits of Liberty. Moscow: Taurus Alpha. (In Russ.)

Визуализация выбора: история и современное состояние предвыборной агитации в России / под ред. К. В. Киселева, О. Б. Подвинцева, О. А. Рябовой. Пермь: Пермский научный центр УрО РАН, 2016.

Kiselev K. V., Podvintsev O. B., Ryabova O. A. (eds.) (2016) Visualization of Choice: History and the Modern State of Pre-Electoral Agitation in Russia. Perm: Perm Federal Research Center of the Ural Branch of the Russian Academy of Sciences. (In Russ.)

Гельман В. Я. Эволюция электоральной политики в России: на пути к недемократической консолидации? // Политическая наука. 2005. № 2. С. 8—25.

Gelman V. Ya. (2005) Evolution of Electoral Politics in Russia: On the Way to Undemocratic Consolidation? Political Science (RU). No. 2. Р. 8—25. (In Russ.)

Гусев Д. Г., Матвейчев О. А., Хазеев Р. Р., Чернаков С. Ю. Уши машут ослом. Современное социальное программирование. Пермь: Alex J. Bakster Group, 2002.

Gusev D. G., Matveychev O. A., Khazeev R. R., Chernakov S. Yu. (2002) Ears Wave a Donkey. Modern Social Programming. Perm: Alex J. Bakster Group. (In Russ.)

Колесник Н. В. «Я противник режима, но всегда работаю на “Единую Россию”», или о политтехнологическом сообществе в современной России // Мир России. 2021. Т. 30. № 4. С. 79—105. https://doi.org/10.17323/1811-038X-2021-30-4-79-105.

Kolesnik N. V. (2021) “I Oppose the Regime but I Always Work for ‘Yedinaya Rossiya’”: On the Community of Political Strategists in Modern Russia. Universe of Russia. Vol. 30. No. 4. Р. 79—105. https://doi.org/10.17323/1811-038X-2021-30-4-79-105. (In Russ.)

Кордонский С. Сословная структура постсоветской России. М.: Институт Фонда «Общественное мнение», 2008.

Kordonsky S. (2008) The Estate Structure of Post-Soviet Russia. Moscow: Institute of the Public Opinion Foundation. (In Russ.)

Кынев А. В. Выборы парламентов российских регионов 2003—2009: первый цикл внедрения пропорциональной избирательной системы. М.: Центр «Панорама», 2009.

Kynev A. V. (2009) Elections of Parliaments of Russian Regions 2003—2009: The First Cycle of Introducing a Proportional Electoral System. Moscow: Panorama Center. (In Russ.)

Левин С. Н. «Рынки власти», режимы прав собственности и политический ресурс предпринимателей в современной России // Мир России. 2014. Т. 23. № 4. C. 35-58.

Levin S. N. (2014) “Power Markets”, Property Rights and Political Resource of Entrepreneurs in Modern Russia. Universe of Russia. Vol. 23. No. 4. P. 35—58. (In Russ.)

Малкин Е., Сучков Е. Основы избирательных технологий. М.: Русская панорама, 2000.

Malkin E., Suchkov E. (2000) Fundamentals of Electoral Technologies. Moscow: Russian Panorama. (In Russ.)

Максимов А. «Чистые» и «грязные» технологии выборов. Российский опыт. М.: Дело, 1999.

Maksimov A. (1999) “Clean” and “Dirty” Election Technologies. Russian Experience. Moscow: Delo. (In Russ.)

Матвейчев О. А. Что такое политический консалтинг? Екатеринбург: Губернский издательский дом «Ведомости», 1998.

Matveychev O. A. (1998) What is the Political Consulting? Yekaterinburg: Provincial Publishing House “Vedomosti”. (In Russ.)

Нисневич Ю. А. Электоральная коррупция в России: политико-правовой анализ федеральных избирательных кампаний в 2003—2012 годах. М.: Фонд «Либеральная Миссия», 2014.

Nisnevich Yu. A. (2014) Electoral Corruption in Russia: Political and Legal Analysis of Federal Election Campaigns in 2003—2012. Moscow: Liberal Mission Foundation. (In Russ.)

Нисневич Ю. А. Восстание советских масс: политико-антропологический анализ // Общественные науки и современность. 2018. № 2. С. 127—139.

Nisnevich Yu. A. (2018) Revolt of the Soviet Masses: Politico-Anthropological Analysis. Social Sciences and Contemporary World. No. 2. P. 127—139. (In Russ.)

Нуреев P. M., Шульгин С. Г. Взаимосвязь экономического и политического монополизма в российских регионах: административный ресурс и формы его проявления // экономический вестник Ростовского государственного университета. 2006. Т. 4. № 3. C. 33—40.

Nureev R. M., Shulgin S. G. (2006) Interrelation of Economic and Political Monopolism in Russian Regions: Administrative Resource and Forms of Its Manifestations. Economic Herald of Rostov State University. Vol. 4. No. 3. P. 33—40. (In Russ.)

Нуреев Р. М. Административный ресурс и его эволюция в постсоветской России // Есть ли место политэкономии в современной экономической науке? Материалы научной конференции Института экономики РАН и Новой экономической ассоциации / под ред. М. И. Воейкова. М.: Институт экономики РАН, 2013. С. 191—207.

Nureyev R. M. Administrative Resource and Its Evolution in Post-Soviet Russia. In: Voeykov M. I. (ed.) Is There a Place for Political Economy in Contemporary Economics? Proceedings of the Academic Conference of the Institute of Economics of the Russian Academy of Sciences and the New Economic Association. Moscow: Institute of Economics of the Russian Academy of Sciences. P. 191—207. (In Russ.)

О’Дей Б. Планирование политических кампаний. Шаг за шагом к победе на выборах. М., 1999.

O’Day B. (1999) Political Campaign Planning Manual. A Step-by-Step Guide to Winning Elections. Moscow. (In Russ.)

Пшизова С. Н. За спиной партий вождей: спин-доктор у руля // Политические партии и политическая конкуренция в демократических и недемократических режимах / под ред. Ю. Г. Коргунюка, Е. Ю. Мелешкиной, Г. М. Михалевой. М.: КМК, 2010. С. 11—25.

Pshizova S. N. (2010) Behind the Party Leaders: Spin Doctor at the Helm. In: Korgunyuk Yu. G., Meleshkina E. Yu., Mikhaleva G. M. (eds.) Political Parties and Political Competition in Democratic and Non-Democratic Regimes. Moscow: KMK. P. 11—25. (In Russ.).

Серавин А., Соколова Е. Современные технологии в электоральных процессах. Санкт-Петербург: Электронная электоральная политика; Экспертный институт социальных исследований, 2019.

Seravin A., Sokolova E. (2019) Contemporary Technologies in Electoral Processes. Saint Petersburg: Electronic Electoral Politics; Expert Institute for Social Research. (In Russ.)

Balasubramaniam R. R. (2008) Indefinite Detention: Rule by Law or Rule of Law? In: Ramraj V. V. (ed.) Emergencies and the Limits of Legality. Cambridge. Cambridge University Press. Р. 118—142. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511552021.006.

Barsukova S., Denisova-Schmidt E. (2022) Double Standards as Modus Operandi: Mixing Business and Politics in Russia. Europe-Asia Studies. Vol. 74. No. 6. P. 990—1005. https://doi.org/10.1080/09668136.2021.1913100.

Gekker A. (2019) Playing with Power: Casual Politicking a New Frame for Political Analysis. In: Glas R., Lammes S., Lange M., Raessens J., Vries I. (eds.) The Playful Citizen: Civic Engagement in a Mediatized Culture. Amsterdam: Amsterdam University Press. P. 377—419. https://doi.org/10.1515/9789048535200-023.

Lodge Т. (1998) Political Corruption in South Africa. African Affairs. Vol. 97. No. 387. P. 157—187. https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordjournals.afraf.a007924.

Szakonyi D. (2021) Politics for Profit: Business, Elections, and Policymaking in Russia. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/9781108869089.

Levitsky S., Way L. A. (2010) Competitive Authoritarianism after the Cold War. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511781353.

Levitsky S., Way L. (2020) The New Competitive Authoritarianism. Journal of Democracy. Vol. 31. No. 1. P. 51—65. https://doi.org/10.1353/jod.2020.0004.

Magaloni B. (2010) The Game of Electoral Fraud and the Ousting of Authoritarian Rule. American Journal of Political Science. Vol. 54. No. 3. P. 751—765. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-5907.2010.00458.x.

Schedler A. (2006) The Logic of Electoral Authoritarianism. In: Schedler A. (ed.) Electoral Authoritarianism: The Dynamics of Unfree Competition. Boulder, CO: Lynne Rienner Publishers. P. 1—23.

Simpser A. (2013) Why Governments and Parties Manipulate Elections: Theory, Practice, And Implications. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139343824.

Treisman D. (2007) What Have We Learned About the Causes of Corruption from Ten Years of Cross-National Empirical Research? Annual Review of Political Science. No. 10. Р. 211—244. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.polisci.10.081205.095418.

Published

2023-03-07

How to Cite

Kolesnik, N. V. (2023). The Evolution of Electoral Technique in Russia: from Door-to-Door to Digitall Control and Back. Monitoring of Public Opinion: Economic and Social Changes, (1). https://doi.org/10.14515/monitoring.2023.1.2340

Issue

Section

Political Sociology