“You Owe Me a Drink for That”: The Soviet Rituals of Commodity Redistribution

НАСТОЯЩИЙ МАТЕРИАЛ (ИНФОРМАЦИЯ) ПРОИЗВЕДЕН,РАСПРОСТРАНЕН И (ИЛИ) НАПРАВЛЕН ИНОСТРАННЫМ АГЕНТОМ АРХИПОВОЙ АЛЕКСАНДРОЙ СЕРГЕЕВНОЙ ЛИБО КАСАЕТСЯ ДЕЯТЕЛЬНОСТИ ИНОСТРАННОГО АГЕНТА АРХИПОВОЙ АЛЕКСАНДРЫ СЕРГЕЕВНЫ

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.14515/monitoring.2023.2.2132

Keywords:

rituals of commodity redistribution, “limited good”, moral economy, the fear of envy, gift exchange, moral and supernatural sanctions

Abstract

The paper researches the Soviet ritual of treating a group on the occasion of getting material or symbolic benefit from an individual (in spoken Russian, they are called by the words obmyt’ and prostavit’sya). In the paper, these rituals are considered as a kind of symbolic benefit sharing: buying drinks and food on the occasion of getting a good, the individual gives back their part to the group. In conditions of “limited good” (G. Foster), such rituals are especially relevant because they allow the beneficiary to protect himself from possible envy of others. The Soviet economic system preserved the image of “limited good” in the cognitive orientations of people, and at the same time, it developed the skill of maintaining personal relationships through acts of non-monetary exchange. Therefore, participation in such rituals was not entirely voluntary: many Soviet people had ideas about moral and supernatural sanctions for refusing to treat the group, and they often faced the pressure of the group, requiring them to share excessive benefits. After the collapse of the Soviet system, these rituals did not entirely disappear, but they became less common and lost their binding nature.

Acknowledgements. The study was supported by the grant of the Russian Scientific Society No. 20-18-00342 “Institutional and non-institutional rituals in the structure of Late Soviet society (1956-1985)”.

We thank historian Alexander Fokin, associate professor of Tyumen State University, for his help in conducting the study, who asked the students of the elective course “Anthropology of the Soviet” to record interviews with their relatives. We are also grateful to our colleague Elena Yugai, who kindly shared with us the materials of her interviews, and to the students of the Russian School of Economics, Tyumen State University and the A. P. Chekhov Taganrog Institute, who conducted interviews with relatives for us, answered the questionnaire and wrote ethnographic essays.

Author Biographies

Anna A. Kirzyuk, University of Tyumen

  • University of Tyumen, Tyumen, Russia
    • Cand. Sci. (Philology), Researcher at the Network Research Center “Man, Nature, Technology”
  • Russian Presidential Academy of National Economy and Public Administration, Moscow, Russia
    • Senior Researcher at the Laboratory of Theoretical Folklore Studies

Alexandra S. Arkhipova, University of Tyumen

  • University of Tyumen, Tyumen, Russia
    • Researcher at the Network Research Center “Man, Nature, Technology”
  • Russian Presidential Academy of National Economy and Public Administration, Moscow, Russia
    • Cand. Sci. (Philology), Senior Researcher at the Laboratory of Theoretical Folklore Studies

References

Архипова А.С.*, Кирзюк А.А., Югай Е.В. Рожки да ножки: ритуал разрывания связи между животным и его хозяином от традиционной деревни до позднесоветского города // Вестник Сургутского государственного педагогического университета. 2020. № 6. С. 106―112. URL: http://www.surgpu.ru/nauchnaya-deyatelnost/vestnik-surgpu/vse-nomera/6-69-2020/statya-11/ (дата обращения: 10.04.2023).

Arkhipova A.S.*, Kirzyuk A.A., Yugaj E.F. (2020) Horns and Legs: The Ritual of Breaking the Connection Between an Animal and Its Owner, from a Traditional Village to a Late Soviet Town. Surgut State Pedagogical University Bulletin. No. 6. P. 106―112. URL: http://www.surgpu.ru/nauchnaya-deyatelnost/vestnik-surgpu/vse-nomera/6-69-2020/statya-11/ (accessed: 10.04.2023). (In Russ.)

Белоусова Е. Родильный обряд // Современный городской фольклор / сост. А. Ф. Белоусов, И. С. Веселова, С. Ю. Неклюдов. М.: РГГУ, 2003. С. 339―369.

Belousova E. (2003) Childbirth Rite. In: Belousov A. F., Veselova I. S., Neklyudov M. (eds.) Modern Urban Folklore. Moscow: Russian State University for the Humanities. P. 339―369. (In Russ.)

Журавлев А. «Обмывание копыт» (из восточнославянской лексики и фразеологии, связанной с ритуалами купли-продажи скота) // Славянское и балканское языкознание / отв. ред. Э. И. Зеленина, В. В. Усачева, Т. В. Цивьян. М.: РАН, 1984. С. 109―114.

Zhuravlev A. (1984) “Hoof Washing” (From the East Slavic Vocabulary and Phraseology, Associated with the Rituals of Buying and Selling of Livestock). In: Zelenina E. I., Usacheva V. V., Tsivyan T. V. (eds.) Slavic and Balkan Linguistics. Moscow: RAS. P. 109―114. (In Russ.)

Зайцева Н. Этнографические наблюдения в театре имени Ленсовета // Журнал социологии и социальной антропологии. 2003. Т. 6. № 1. C. 162—167. URL: http://www.jourssa.ru/jourssa/article/view/1673 (дата обращения: 10.04.2023).

Zaitseva N. (2003) The Ethnographic Observations in Lensovet Theatre. The Journal of Sociology and Social Anthropology. Vol. 6. No. 1. P. 162—167. URL: http://www.jourssa.ru/jourssa/article/view/1673 (accessed: 10.04.2023). (In Russ.)

Залегина В.В. Социальный портрет руководителя системы органов прокуратуры // Вестник РУДН. Серия: Социология. 2007. № 1. С. 60―72.

Zalegina V.V. (2007) Social Portrait of the Public Prosecution System Top Officials. RUDN Journal of Sociology. No. 1. P. 60― 72. (In Russ.)

Мосс М. Общества. Обмен. Личность. Труды по социальной антропологии. М.: КДУ, 2011.

Mauss M. (2011) The Gift. Moscow: KDU. (In Russ.)

Плунгян В.А. Корпус как инструмент и как идеология: о некоторых уроках современной корпусной лингвистики // Русский язык в научном освещении. 2008. № 2. С. 7—20. URL: https://rjano.ruslang.ru/ru/archive/2008-2/7-20 (дата обращения: 10.04.2023).

Plungian V.A. (2008) Corpus as a Tool and as Ideology: About Some Lessons of Modern Corpus Linguistics. Russian Language and Linguistic Theory. No. 2. P. 7—20. URL: https://rjano.ruslang.ru/ru/archive/2008-2/7-20 (accessed: 10.04.2023). (In Russ.)

Салинз М. Экономика каменного века. М.: ОГИ, 1999.

Sahlins M. (1999) Stone Age Economics. Moscow: OGI. (In Russ.)

Утехин И. Очерки коммунального быта. М.: ОГИ, 2004.

Utekhin I. (2004) Essays on Everyday Life in a Communal Apartment. Moscow: OGI. (In Russ.)

Хайнцен Дж. Искусство взятки. Коррупция при Сталине 1943—1953 гг. М.: РОССПЭН, 2021.

Heinzen J. (2021) The Art of the Bribe. Corruption under Stalin, 1943—1953. Moscow: ROSSPEN. (In Russ.)

Foster G. (1965) Peasant Society and the Image of Limited Good. American Anthropologist. Vol. 67. No. 2. P. 293—315. https://doi.org/10.1525/aa.1965.67.2.02a00010.

Foster G.M. (1972) The Anatomy of Envy: A Study in Symbolic Behavior. Current Anthropology. Vol. 13. No. 2. P. 165—202. https://doi.org/10.1086/201267.

Fitzpatrick S. (2000) Blat in Stalin’s Time. In: Lovell S., Ledeneva A., Rogachevskii A. (eds.) Bribery and Blat in Russia: Negotiating Reciprocity from the Middle Ages to the 1990s. New York, NY: Macmillan Press; St. Martin’s Press. P. 166—182.

Herlihy P. (1991) Joy of the Rus’: Rites and Rituals of Russian Drinking. The Russian Review. Vol. 50. No. 2. Р. 131—147. https://doi.org/10.2307/131155 .

Humphrey C. (2000) Rethinking Bribery in Contemporary Russia. In: Lovell S., Ledeneva A., Rogachevskii A. (eds.) Bribery and Blat in Russia: Negotiating Reciprocity from the Middle Ages to the 1990s. New York, NY: Macmillan Press; St. Martin’s Press. P. 216—241.

Ledeneva A. (1998) Russia’s Economy of Favours: Blat, Networking and Informal Exchange. London: University of London.

Patico J. (2002) Chocolate and Cognac: Gifts and the Recognition of Social Worlds in Post-Soviet Russia. Ethnos. Journal of Anthropology. Vol. 67. No. 3. Р. 345—368. https://doi.org/10.1080/0014184022000031202.

* 26.05.2023 внесена в реестр иностранных агентов.

Published

2023-05-08

How to Cite

Kirzyuk А. А., & Arkhipova А. С. (2023). “You Owe Me a Drink for That”: The Soviet Rituals of Commodity Redistribution: НАСТОЯЩИЙ МАТЕРИАЛ (ИНФОРМАЦИЯ) ПРОИЗВЕДЕН,РАСПРОСТРАНЕН И (ИЛИ) НАПРАВЛЕН ИНОСТРАННЫМ АГЕНТОМ АРХИПОВОЙ АЛЕКСАНДРОЙ СЕРГЕЕВНОЙ ЛИБО КАСАЕТСЯ ДЕЯТЕЛЬНОСТИ ИНОСТРАННОГО АГЕНТА АРХИПОВОЙ АЛЕКСАНДРЫ СЕРГЕЕВНЫ. Monitoring of Public Opinion: Economic and Social Changes, (2). https://doi.org/10.14515/monitoring.2023.2.2132

Most read articles by the same author(s)